Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (1575)	7/30/2003 1:44:36 PM
From: MSI	Respond to of 20039

LOL! You should be chief speechwriter for the lost Democrats. I'll send this simple, declarative statement along to a few, including Dean, who manages better than the rest to make simple declarative sentences. ------------------------ "Iraq wasn't armed well enough to handle a Cub Scout troop. Hundreds of Americans have been killed. Thousands of Iraqis have been killed. Bush's oil buddies got the mine and tax payers got the shaft. Bush lied about everything and should be impeached. Is that really so hard to understand? No body wants a weasel for President. We've had too many weasels already. "

To: Don Earl who wrote (1575)	7/30/2003 1:49:48 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Hi Don, I think we have a cup half full/half empty disagreement. :) I thought Bob Graham did a good job on Meet the Press, especially when Russert pressed the issue of impeachment. And even getting the "I" word out on Fox is a plus in my book. I'm favorably inclined toward Bob Graham's approach for the time being. Think of the alternatives. Think of Tom DeLay, and Graham doesn't appear to be a weasel at all. <g> *********** On a different note, here's a citizen's righteous outrage at the stonewalling that the White House is engaged in in the 9/11 inquiries: buzzflash.com Title: "ACCESS DENIED" to Joint Inquiry on 9-11 by Bush Administration

To: Don Earl who wrote (1575)	7/30/2003 2:10:34 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

If memory serves me correctly [Graham] was one of the guys meeting with Pakistan while Pakistan was sending $100K to Atta. How about a link or some documentation other than your 'memory'? LPS5

To: Don Earl who wrote (1575)	7/30/2003 8:35:42 PM
From: MSI	Respond to of 20039

Courageous members of Congress may also have interest in Graham’s “notebooks filled with jotted records of every meeting and phone call.” (Associated Press, 5-30-2002) And Knight Ridder (6-4-2002) added that the relatively tight time frame [Goss wants the 9/11 investigation report finished by January, 2003] may encourage some [Administration agencies] to “run out the clock” and hold back potentially embarrassing information. The evidence of White House and media cover up of that important visit just prior to the attacks by the individual supplying the money to finance the terrorists is only made more crucial when one considers that so many high government officials met with this person -- some while the attacks were in progress. However, Americans are being denied an explanation and a carefully thorough public investigation of this evidence. Further completing the circle, a Times of India report (3-7-2001) reveals that “The CIA worked in tandem with Pakistan to create the ‘monster’ that is today Afghanistan’s ruling Taliban,” a leading U.S. expert on South Asia had said months prior to the attacks. Selig Harrison from the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars added, “The CIA made a historic mistake in encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan.” But more importantly, Harrison reveals that “the old associations between the intelligence agencies continue....The CIA still has close links with the ISI.” Americans may now wonder what terrorist money man and ISI Chief Ahmad was discussing with George Tenet, Colin Powell, and members of Congress during those long meetings prior to the worst attacks on American soil in our history. And after all this, some U.S. citizens may even question whether there is anyone left to depose Bush Administration officials and Members of Congress under oath who would never subpoena themselves to offer explanations for demonstrated conflicts of interest -- or worse. Copyright (c) 2002 by Thomas Flocco. tomflocco.com