SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (108965)7/30/2003 10:39:28 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The masters, the winners in this game, (Mao and Ho) they have a long historical track record to study. They wrote a lot about it

Yeah, and their number one rule was that the guerillas had to have the sympathies of most of the population, a condition that does NOT apply in Afghanistan or Iraq. Mao and Ho had the advantage of being revolutionaries aspiring to office; they didn't have a track record of being in office. And boy, do the Taliban and Saddam have stinko track records!



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (108965)7/31/2003 8:58:43 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
This is one of the very discouraging things, this total lack of understanding, by most Americans, of how guerrilla wars are fought, how these wars are won and lost.

Uh.. maybe you've forgotten where "Indian Fighting" was first developed??

The British were very frustrated at the manner in which the American colonists fought their forces during the American revolution.... It just wasn't "cricket"..

And they way many British officers tried to stifle it was through repression of the local population and civilian atrocities.

Of course, the American forces did the same thing with Indian tribes...

No... I would say that we have considerable experience with guerilla warfare. We just keep forgetting the lessons because we've become "civilized"..

Hawk