SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Rose who wrote (437104)8/1/2003 1:18:14 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The truly stupid cannot connect the dots. Those who think up an idea for a terror scenario and then train those who will commit the terror or even those who will train those who commit that terror are connected.

Salman Park exists, testimony of ex Iraqis about it's use are on the public record.



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (437104)8/1/2003 4:08:40 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
"No, they <the Bush Admin> said that there was a link
between Saddam and the 9/11 attack."


Actually that's a lie fabricated by liberal democratic
politicians & liberal media. No one in the Bush
administration ever claimed that Iraq was involved in the
9/11 attacks. This outrageous lie was repeated over & over.

Now folks like you who aren't capable of separating fact
from fiction believe all these liberal lies & use them to
justify your hate of the Bush Admin..... regardless of the
facts..... and in spite of the horrifically repugnant
behavior of your own liberal democratic politicians that
are genuinely treacherous & willing to harm America to
regain power.



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (437104)8/1/2003 4:37:47 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
they said that there was a link between Saddam and the 9/11 attack. Had we been attacked by Iraqi terrorists before that? Are we planning on attacking all countries that have some sort of terrorists

I thought you could connect at least some of the dots... let's try again...

Paul Wolfowitz told NBC, "If in 2001, or in 2000, or in 1999, we had gone to war in Afghanistan to deal with Osama bin Laden, and we had tried to say, 'It's because he's planning to kill 3,000 people in New York,' people would have said, 'Well, you don't have any proof of that,'" he said.

"Well, you can't have it both ways. If you wait until you have absolute certainty about terrorism, you are really saying, 'We'll wait until after the fact and deal with it.'"

cnn.com

GZ