SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Earl who wrote (1627)8/1/2003 9:25:18 PM
From: Rick Faurot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20039
 
gregpalast.com
BUSH AND THE SAUDIS SITTIN' IN A TREE . . . KAY EYE ESS ESS EYE EN GEE
The President Exempts Gays from Marriage, Saudis from Guilt Web Log
Friday, August 1, 2003
by Greg Palast
Well, well, well. President George was in one hell of bind this week when it turned that that Saudi Arabia funded Al Qaeda, not Iraq. Realizing we'd invaded the wrong country, Bush did the honorable thing: he's come out against gay marriages.
This caused some real confusion in my staff where a gay member of our investigations team announced he was changing his allegiance from Howard Dean to George Bush. "Bush Saves Gays from Marriage! Bush Saves Gays!" he rushed around the office beaming. "Gay people exempt from going to in-laws for Thanksgiving dinner! Gay-mericans exempt from PTA meetings and hiring divorce lawyers!"
But then I had to bring him down to earth. ('Had to' because, while Bush announced last month that our conquest of Iraq had made 'the world a safer place', our President mentioned THIS week there's now a 'real threat' of new Al Qaeda hijackings. So America is safer? As long as one stays indoors.)
But here's the real kick in the head. Turns out that unlike the 18 minutes missing from the Nixon tape, the 28 pages missing from Congress' publicly released report on the September 11 attack has been found. And it turns out to be a summary of Saudi Arabia's financing of terrorist fronts including the 'charities' supporting Al Qaeda.
And now, the New York Times tells us, the US Senate has been embarrassed into holding hearings on those Saudi charity fronts including one named WAMY.
Of course, this is ancient news to those who watched my report on WAMY and Saudi funding of terror -- broadcast on BBC's evening news on November 9, 2001. (In the USA, that report earned me the title of 'conspiracy nut.' In America, a 'conspiracy nut' is defined as a journalist who reports the news two years before the New York Times.)
And here's the ugly little punchline to the story you WON'T read in the Times. Why has the Bush Administration covered up for WAMY and the Saudi's other blood-soaked 'charity' operations?
For the answer, let me take you back to Midland, Texas, 1986. A young old man, George W. Bush, seems to have trouble finding oil. But he strikes it rich when his flailing drilling partnership is bought out by Harken Oil. Despite the addition of the business acumen of Bush Jr., Harken faces collapse; but is pulled from the brink by a cash infusion from a Saudi, Sheik Bakhsh. The money from Arabia has nothing to do, we must assume, with Dubya's daddy at the time holding the post of Vice-President of the Free World.
The Bakhsh booty continued a pattern of the young Bush being saved from his dire business decisions by a line of Sheik angels. His first oil company, Arbusto, going bust-o, was aided by the American financial representative of the bin Ladin family.
And on BBC TV last month, I reported this: following the bombing of our embassies, the Clinton Administration sent two delegations to Saudi Arabia to tell their royal highnesses to stop giving money to the guys who are killing us. But Mr. Bush, once in office, put the kibosh on unfriendly words to the Saudis.
Furthermore, in the summer of 2001, Mr. Bush disbanded the US intelligence unit tracking funding of Al Qaeda. What is it our G-men were uncovering? According to two separate sources speaking to BBC, the funders of Al Qaeda fronts include those who have previously funded Bush family business and political ventures.
Now that's a wee bit embarrassing. Something you wouldn't want in a congressional report. Something you may not want the FBI to dwell on. (And you can unlock the womens and children: the BBC reports will NOT be broadcast on US television.)
And there's this: a document marked "Secret" and "199I" (meaning 'national security') which found its way out of the offices of the FBI in into the office of our BBC/Guardian newspaper team. It indicates (and whistleblowers confirmed) that, prior to the September 11 attack, the Bush Administration held back agents of the FBI from tracking two members of the bin Laden family. According to the buried FBI report, the bin Laden lads were operating in the USA for "a suspected terrorist organization", WAMY.
But we mustn't ask too many questions of the Bush Administration's blindfolding the FBI, nor, Heaven forbid, discomfit the Saudis over their contributions to Terror-R-Us. After all, in BushWorld, Saudi Arabia and America have shared values: we want our boys to kill, not to kiss.
Greg Palast is author of the New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, which includes the award-winning report, "Did Our President Spike the Investigation of bin Laden?" View his report for BBC Television's Newsnight on Bush, WAMY and the bin Ladens at www.GregPalast.com



To: Don Earl who wrote (1627)8/2/2003 6:07:27 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20039
 
It's true that the engineers were surprised the towers came down. They were built to withstand just about anything.

I read that the planes were too well flown to be in the control of terrorists. The article suggested that the planes were flown remotely using pre-installed equipment. it would then have to have been a military operation. Israel, the US, or both? That's probably why there are no transcripts of the conversations between tower and planes. The communications had to be cut because the pilots would be saying, We lost control of our plane. Who's flying the plane? Since when do terrorists let passengers make cell phone calls? When the passengers on flight 93 stormed the front cabin they would have found the pilots trying to control the plane and nobody else. How could that ever be explained. That's why that flight was shot down by the military and is now being covered up. The fighter pilots who were dogging that flight cannot be interviewed and the official story is that they did not fire. But evidence shows that they did. There was an 8 mile debris trail before the plane crashed including a complete passenger jet engine which fell off two miles before the crash. The government could have been monitoring the cell phone calls and knew that when they stormed the pilot's cabin and saw what was going on they would get on their cell phones and the real stroy would get out.

seebo.net

flight93crash.com



To: Don Earl who wrote (1627)8/2/2003 9:39:24 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 20039
 
Your evidence is?



To: Don Earl who wrote (1627)8/3/2003 11:24:50 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20039
 
There isn't any doubt in my mind that the collapse of the WTC towers was the result of planted explosives.

I remember seeing a report by a seismologist saying that there were shock readings before the WTC came down.

Tom



To: Don Earl who wrote (1627)8/3/2003 11:11:13 PM
From: WaveSeeker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
You're an idiot.