Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (109933)	8/4/2003 4:11:10 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

>>"Various officials differed in opinion as to whether the buried aircraft could ever fly again. Many of the planes were buried intact with minimal efforts to protect them from the sand."<< Yup, food for thought...... ...in 45 minutes those Iraqis were going to dig up the planes then combine those documents in the Iraqi "scientist's?" backyard, with the uranium from Niger, build a Nuke and fly it into the WH. Btw, how come our superior "intelligence" that knew about all those WMDs, didn't know that the Iraqi infrastructure....water, electricity etc was in such bad shape??

To: Neocon who wrote (109933)	8/4/2003 6:14:03 PM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

He said the planes were not considered weapons of mass destruction for which coalition troops have been searching for months, ''but they are weapons (Iraq) tried to hide.'' They really buried that paragraph in the story. What are we to reason from the story? 1 The planes were so good we hid them. 2 The planes were so bad we hid them. 3 We can put our planes anywhere we want to. Did we go to war because (IRAQ) tried to hide weapons? So it wasn't weapons of mass destruction.It was just weapons. Rascal @OnTheHunt.com