SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gulo who wrote (2899)8/5/2003 1:18:19 PM
From: Stephen O  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 37549
 
I think that this gay marriage business will prove very detrimental to the Liberals. I have no objection to unions being recognised by the state through civil ceremonies but I am unhappy at them being called marriages. For the State, Chretien, Martin, c'est moi, this will be a big problem, especially if they insist that churches, mosques etc do the marriage ceremonies. Conservative minded people like Catholics, Sikhs, Muslims will reconsider automatically voting Liberal.



To: Gulo who wrote (2899)8/5/2003 11:53:22 PM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 37549
 
The Policy
or
The Charter of Right and Freedoms

The Alliance policy is the problem.
Many readers from Western Canada may not be able to spot the contentious phrases that spell the death knell of Alliance federal ambitions, it isn't any single policy, though a few are clearly atrocious (choose one), readers from Eastern Canada apparently see them fine. (see election results for Reform/Alliance).
Canada has a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the interpretation of this document is not left in the hands of politicians (not even the Liberals), politicians can be extremely partisan and petty, it is left in the hands of the courts.
The courts decision on same sex marriage is clear and is based on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, would you like a person like Mr. Day having the power to decide what Canadian freedoms were legitimate ?

Would you vote for this guy #reply-19177303