Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (1735)	8/5/2003 10:22:28 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Ray, Here's some of the stuff I've come up with on Rosenberg. I'm afraid my opinion remains unchanged, but that's probably because I'm color blind when it comes to telling the difference between a left wing weasel and a right wing weasel. Weasels all look the same to me. insightmag.com news.bbc.co.uk DR BARBARA ROSENBERG: FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS: This person is.. knows a lot about forensic matters, knows exactly what he can be prosecuted for and what he can get away with and I think he had some personal matters that he might have wanted to settle but I think in addition that he felt that biodefence was being under-emphasised for some time in the past WATTS: Rosenberg's claims are astonishing but she's an insider with good contacts. She thinks the FBI must act soon. ROSENBERG: I think the time is rapidly coming when it will be very important to bring him to trial, even if they don't think they have sufficient evidence. This might at least, if not result in a criminal conviction, make it possible to bring civil charges somewhat like what happened to OJ Simpson in the past. So I think it's time to start moving because it's very important from the point of view of deterrence of any possible future terrorist. fas.org I have never mentioned any names in connection with the anthrax investigation, not to the FBI, nor to media, nor to Senate Committees or staffs, not to anyone. I have never said or written anything publicly that pointed only to one specific person. Anyone who sees parallels is expressing his own opinion. It is the FBI that has gone out of its way to make one suspect's name public. I presume they must have had some good reason for doing that; only time will tell. But if the publicity was not an important part of their investigative strategy, I think it was reprehensible. gopusa.com In June 2002, Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, who affiliates herself with the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), saw fit to discuss Hatfill as an anthrax suspect in a meeting with the FBI agents and Senate staffers. Rosenberg and Hatfill differ on whether the United States should sign on to the International biological weapons convention. He opposes, she favors. Hatfill said, "I don't know Dr. Rosenberg. I have never met her; I have never spoken or corresponded with this woman. I am at a complete loss to explain her reported hostility and accusations. I don't know this woman at all."