SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (71631)8/5/2003 10:37:38 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
In many areas of life, there is the rule and then there is the exception. Which should be the rule, and which the exception, is often not so hard to discern, one need only consider the opposite case: what if the exception were the rule, and vice versa? If the consequences are better one way or the other, you know which should be the rule, which the exception. But if the rule is to remain the rule, and the exception the exception, there have to be criteria for making the exception. In some instances, they may not be very rigorous: having a strong personal motive might suffice. In others, the criteria should be stricter, like using deadly force only to stop a threat to life or limb. Regardless, there have to be some criteria.

To make the distinction between the rule and the exception is not necessarily to say that the exception is wrong. It may be merely that the rule is better. However, obviously it is irrational to choose the lesser option without adequate reason.

An adequate reason does not especially dignify the choice of the lesser option, it permits it. Religious commitment dignifies the choice to go childless, however, at least among those sympathetic to religious practice. I don't think I was oozing contempt at all,I was just being blunt.

I use PC to mean having kneejerk reactions that preclude real dialogue and distort the content of my posts......



To: Lane3 who wrote (71631)8/5/2003 12:11:49 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I think it is better that children are raised by only those
well qualified to do so and who want them enough to make the sacrifices.


I would say that you fit the first half of that equation wonderfully, and it is a shame that some children were deprived of the opportunity to have you for amother. And a shame that society doesn't get the benefit of children raised by you.