SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (71638)8/5/2003 11:15:13 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Is it a matter of indifference if most people, most of the time, pursue a basic education. Would it be just as well if most people, most of the time, were practically illiterate and very ignorant of basic knowledge?

Is it better if most people, most of the time, were considerate of others? Or would rudeness be a better rule for social intercourse?

Is it better if most of the time the will of the majority were respected, rather than overridden by judges? Or would it be better to have most decisions made in court, without direct accountability to the electorate?

These are a few of the issues I have discussed where I alleged some rules. They seem to me plainly ripe for such treatment. Can you think of something where I insisted on a rule where it is pretty clearly a matter of indifference?



To: Lane3 who wrote (71638)8/5/2003 11:37:10 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I would like to address the question of raw language. Half the language attributed to me has been fantasy, so I do not know how raw it was to begin with. What is clear is that a couple of you have been so sensitive that you "hear things" I didn't even say. Whether, in that circumstance, it would have mattered much how I had phrased things, as long as was determined to be honest about what I thought, seems to me to be an open question......