Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: laura_bush who wrote (25352)	8/13/2003 12:10:38 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 89467

conservatism can be explained psychologically as a set of neuroses rooted in "fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity". Only if you use a very modern definition of conservatism. Remember that conservatism use to mean "keeping the best of what we've got" - i.e. all change is not progress. I don't think that Bob Taft, Dwight Eisenhower or even AuH2O would have fit their profile well. Anyone who remembers Goldwater's tightly argued points, would have a hard time claiming he had a "dislike of nuance". OTOH, the neo-fascism that passes for conservatism today is another matter. That neo-fascists resemble old time fascists is hardly a revelation. Exhibiting the psychological foundation is. Would you happen to have a link to the study's report? JMO lurqer