SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (5150)8/15/2003 1:02:38 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793886
 
Classic Bill post. Two ways to do things: his way and a "socialist" way. As they say, give me a break.

My guess, and it's obviously just that, at the moment, is that it will turn out to be some mix of infrastructure stuff that should have been fixed after the 70s blackouts and wasn't and the overlays of deregulation without attention to consumer needs, a 90s problem. I see utilities like this as natural monopolies and thus, necessarily, under some sort of government management/control/regulations, whatever. What sorts depends on a broad array of variables. I don't view that as socialism. Just a prudent management of a resource base that doesn't work the way those textbook illustrations of chicken farmers and eggs did. Was that what they were?



To: LindyBill who wrote (5150)8/15/2003 1:22:52 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 793886
 
And the answer is more freedom. That this junk is now called "deregulation" is a prime example of how the language is being corrupted to the detriment of rational discussion of issues.

The regulators will not allow any rate adjustment.

This is a classic case of the problems this partial freedom of Utilities has caused.