Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (444783)	8/18/2003 5:54:30 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

ML was a side issue, establishing a pattern of abuse. Were you in a comma during that time?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (444783)	8/18/2003 6:03:25 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

I am sorry but the logic you are using to tie these individuals and events does not wash. If you cannot see the current state of the liberal platform as being one that has fallen on hard times, in fact it has somewhat crumbled; and you do not want to take any responsibility as a liberal, then you are not going to be an effective advocate of change. Regarding Bush vs Clinton scandals. I personally figure Bush used cocaine, clinton inhaled etc. I would have figured Clinton to have concurrent and extravagant affairs...especially considering his outspoken admiration for the Kennedy persona. I believe there is a grain of truth behind all of the hinted at skeletons in both men's closets. I don't much care about any of it. "to lead the country to economic and international ruin?" This, we all care about. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been glorious victories that are clearly bold, noble, and honorable actions led by the USA under the Bush watch. Going forward, all of this could be lost if his administration carries it even one step to far...this is a rational fear and so, a reason to be cautious, ... but not to the point of giving into the fear of brutal tyrants, terrorists, or the blackmail of those who would give them harbor.

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (444783)	8/19/2003 12:31:08 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 769670

From the mouths of babes you will know the truth... Message 19221769 Keep denying the truth and apologizing for clinton with all the other obsolete left wing dinosaurs of the 60s and 70s and don't read the writing on the wall. The first honorable Dem who stands up with any boldness to the clintons and takes responsibility for the obsolete and destructive mechinations of the dinosaurs, will start the recovery of the party...may not happen.

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (444783)	8/19/2003 12:51:11 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I do not believe Clinton used his office to "slander, oppress, brutalize, rape, and degrade women". Suppose an admiral in that US military Slick so despised had had an affair with a young female ensign on his staff and then lied about it at a court of enquiry. What do you think would have happened to that admiral? So the rules are different for the CIC than for an admiral? Why? At the company I work for, managers are strictly prohibited from dating or having other "personal relationships" with employees that work for them. To do so is a termination offense. But this OK for the POTUS, yes?