Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (445280)	8/19/2003 9:13:47 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

This is what you said: "And, boy, I cannot even imagine what the right wing din would have been if Chelsea acted anywhere near like what Bush's kids do." siliconinvestor.com No friggin' media mentioned or nothing. You were just using the misfortunes of Bush's kids to try and hit the right. Pretty friggin' despicable because you really don't know what the right would have done had Chelsea had the same "issues." And using silly kids to make such a dumb point is just stupid. You just do not know. The "right" may have been very charitable perhaps because they understand many of their kids are suffering too. The point is that the Republican right has taken the mantle of 'family values' and 'morality' as a party plank. Given that, it is strange indeed that a blind eye is turned to how these families really are turning out. Drugs, alcohol, affairs, divorce, growing pot, not only do not line up with any 'family values' I know of, but have drawn a strange muteness from the press. Yet another hypocracy of the right. Message 19224331 Yeah sure. The "hypocritical right" has turned a "blind eye" to Bush's kids, but it would have destroyed Clinton via Chelsea. You don't know this at all. And you have no idea how the right would have turned toward Chelsea. You are just making up an "evil strawman Right" to justify rabid leftism, pal. You are no different from Ann Coulter, except in one regard: Coulter is often closer to the truth. You've used Bush's kids to call the right hypocritical, when the right never had a chance to even respond to Chelsea's issues. There just is no hypocrisy here - except in you. You oughta jess shet the bleep up about Coulter. Now I know why she gets under your skin so dang much. You and she are just two sides of the exact same coin - and yet she is more effective than you. Another hypocrisy from the leftists - who don't have a friggin' clue when it comes to integrity.