SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (72694)8/20/2003 7:07:14 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
If you are discussing three year olds, I would be even more vehement about not allowing namecalling. At that age, their ideas of what is and isn't ok are NOT clear. Often what is ok means what I want. That's why you get so much biting and pinching and toy throwing at that age.

You're right about the lack of sophistication and that's why intervention is required. A good teacher or parent steps in and diverts or removes problems. This is not a case of "perpetually butting in"; it's a case of deciding when something goes from a simple "Hey, you cheated!" to a group attack. At three, cheating isn't always something easily understood either. Like you, I am very much in favor of letting kids handle things on their own as much as possible; I just don't believe in allowing damaging behaviors to get started. And I think name-calling is one.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (72694)8/20/2003 7:11:31 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
There you go again, zeroing in on three year olds and claiming a fault that somehow obviates using the approach for ten year olds. You're just being contrary.