Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (72790)	8/21/2003 11:30:44 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I agree, but I don't see how you apply that to the Judge Moore case. Do you think that the opponents of the monument are litening actively to Judge Moore and trying to see his POV? Do you think the ACLU thinks it is hyperventilating and making an honest effort to quit it? Do you think they're trying to find some change that will meet both sets of legitimate interest? I haven't followed the case closely enough to know what negotiations, discussions, etc. they engaged in before filling suit. But I have seen nothing that suggests to me that they accept that Moore has a legitimate POV. Nor, I will agree, the opposite from him. We were talking not about a general issue but about a specific situation. How would you apply your principles to that situation?