SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/22/2003 12:34:57 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
The Bush push

financeasia.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/22/2003 1:07:30 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
U.S. Mortgage Market: Is A Financial Crisis Brewing?

bcaresearch.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/22/2003 1:08:15 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
U.S. Inflation: Heading Higher

bcaresearch.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/22/2003 2:47:31 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
DJ US Economy Is In Trouble In Long Term - Investor Jim Rogers

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Jim Rogers, global investor and author of "Adventure Capitalist," said the U.S. economy is going to get better in the short term - but he is worried about the state of the economy in 2005.

In a CNBC interview Thursday to promote his new book, Rogers said that Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is "printing money at the most rapid rate" ever and President Bush is spending money at the most rapid rate, which will boost the economy for a while, but "it can't go on."

He also said that the U.S. dollar is deeply flawed and Greenspan is debasing the currency, which has "never worked in the long term for anyone."

Rogers believes that the best investment opportunity is in commodities and companies that produce commodities.

-By Jen Ryan; Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5294

08-21-03 1227ET- - 12 27 PM EDT 08-21-03



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/22/2003 2:51:04 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Wall Street great says the market is broken

moneycentral.msn.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/24/2003 12:38:23 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
War Foes Were Right
___________________________

by DON WILLIAMS

August 22, 2003

The French were right.

The liberals were right.

The peaceniks were right.

True conservatives were right.

Veterans opposed to the war - I hear from more of them than you might imagine - were also right. They said this war was based on lies, and it was. They said this war, like most wars, would lead to more chaos and killing, and it has.

Now some in the Bush administration are telling the world that the car bombing of United Nations headquarters in Iraq is evidence that our policy is right.

How illogical can you be? Insurgents blow up oil pipelines and water mains; American soldiers get killed or maimed almost daily. Demonstrations are ongoing. And the biggest blow from the Iraqi resistance so far - destruction of U.N. headquarters in Iraq - is presented by the Bush team as evidence that our policy is correct because - because - because this proves terrorists are really, really bad.

Duh. We all know terrorists are really, really bad. That's why it's best not to give them more chaos in which to thrive. That's why it's best not to stir up new nests unnecessarily as we did by invading Iraq.

The Soviets couldn't win in Afghanistan, and I'll be surprised if, in five years or seven, American-style democracy has taken hold in Iraq. Like Afghanistan under the Russians, Iraq has become the rallying point for a growing jihad.

It all makes for mesmerizing news, and I've spent lots of time tuned to the daily media looking for evidence to support my gut feeling that this war, like most wars, was based on lies and misconceptions from the start. You don't have to look very hard these days. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

Every public argument for making war on Iraq has broken down. Let's start with the biggest:

Weapons of mass destruction: None has been found. I'm sure that, at some point, evidence will mysteriously appear to show Iraq had a weapons program, but we already knew that, and to prove they had a program is a far cry from finding the tons of anthrax and chemical bombs, the armed missiles and mobile labs, the remote drones and nuclear components the Bush team scared us with almost daily in its drive to war.

Speaking of nukes, Bush's allegations were based almost solely on documents he apparently knew were forged. What could be more damning? Bottom line, if WMDs existed, they're now in the hands of terrorists or unfriendly governments or they're up for grabs in the Iraqi desert some place. Either way, it's a bad result.

The link to al-Qaida: The myth that Iraq had significant ties to al-Qaida was based on a hospital visit to Iraq by one man and another meeting in a third country that likely never took place. No evidence has surfaced for an Iraqi-al-Qaida link. Ironically, Bush's misguided war now has forged just such a link. Osama bin Laden recently called on all Muslims to oppose our occupation of Iraq, and they appear to be responding.

Iraq would welcome us as liberators: It happened only in a few places, and some of those appeared stage-managed. Now Iraqis are criticizing and demonstrating and shooting Americans. We've become occupiers. In the process we've killed, maimed, destroyed the Iraqi infrastructure and caused the loss of priceless cultural artifacts from the dawn of civilization. Some of our actions can be justified, but being justified and being wise are different things.

We'd be out in 60 days, leaving behind a democracy that would take root, then blossom across the Middle East: Well, if majority rule flowers in Iraq, Shiites will run the place, as they do in Iran. That's who the majority is.

Saddam Hussein is an evil man who must be destroyed. As this is written, he's still at large. All thinking people hope he's brought in, preferably alive, so he can shed more light on those who helped him in his rise to power, including some now serving Bush.

Now, as I say, the car-bombing of U.N. headquarters in Iraq is being used as proof we're in the right. Two points: One, like several thousand others, those U.N. workers would be alive today except for the will to empire by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and a few others who are pulling the strings.

Two. If, in Country X, the power is out, the water's out, the oil pipeline is burning, unemployment tops 60 percent, murder and rape are daily occurrences, the treasury is looted, the museums are looted, official history is a tool for propaganda, and U.N. headquarters are bombed, then the ruler of Country X should be held accountable, right?

Well, Iraq is Country X. Bush is its ruler.

__________________________________________

Don Williams is the founding editor of New Millennium Writings. You may write to him at PO Box 2463, Knoxville, TN., 37901, e-mail him at donwilliams7@att.net or phone him at 428-0389.

MORE WILLIAMS COLUMNS »

Copyright 2003, KnoxNews. All Rights Reserved.

knoxnews.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/25/2003 1:35:39 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
INVESTING WITH JOHN C. HATHAWAY
________________________________________

Tocqueville Gold Fund
By CAROLE GOULD
The New York Times
8/24/03

nytimes.com

GOLD prices appear poised to reach new highs, in the view of John C. Hathaway, manager of the $280 million Tocqueville Gold fund.

Gold prices were in a bear market for more than 20 years after peaking at $681.50 an ounce in January 1980. Since bottoming at $252 in August 1999, they have since risen to $364.30 — and Mr. Hathaway says they should continue to climb.

"By year-end, gold will be trading over $400 an ounce," he said from his office in Midtown Manhattan, "and within five years, there's a reasonable chance that gold will be trading at four digits."

Mr. Hathaway calls himself a value investor who saw an opportunity in gold, a traditional market hedge, when he started the fund in June 1998. The fund returned 39.1 percent a year, on average, for the three years through Thursday, in contrast to a loss of 11.2 percent for the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index, according to Morningstar Inc. The fund gained 52.4 percent in the last 12 months, compared with a gain of 7.6 percent for the S.& P. 500.

To help build a diversified portfolio, he said, investors should keep 5 to 10 percent of their portfolios in gold investments.

Mr. Hathaway says the current environment for gold reminds him of the 1970's, when the big buildup of credit related to the Vietnam War created weak stock and bond returns and strong gold prices. "In the 1990's, artificially low interest rates created by Federal Reserve intervention skewed the public markets," he said. "That's why we had such a mania, and they don't get corrected overnight."

Mr. Hathaway, 62, is a senior partner at Tocqueville Asset Management, the fund's adviser. He also manages about $100 million for institutions and individuals.

He picks the fund's roughly 75 stocks from about 500 global companies that mine or process gold. He has owned 25 core holdings since the fund's inception in 1997, adding to or trimming positions as valuations shift.

Those core companies, he said, typically have high-quality assets and strong balance sheets and operate in countries with minimal political risk. They usually do not hedge production, which means that their performance is linked closely to changes in gold prices.

To value companies, Mr. Hathaway compares enterprise value — market capitalization plus debt, minus cash — to net present value, or the total value of reserves minus the cost of production in today's dollars.

Typically, he said, companies with multiple mines trade for premiums to their net present value, so he compares a company's current premium with those of its past and those of competitors.

The premium also reflects how bullish investors are about gold prices. Premiums averaged 31 percent at the end of July, according to the Bank of Montreal Nesbitt Burns index, at the low end of their five-year range. They peaked at 120 percent in 1999, he said, but had dwindled to zero by April.

Mr. Hathaway has been adding to his stakes in three gold companies. One is Randgold Resources, an exploration and mining company that is based on the Isle of Jersey and operates primarily in the Ivory Coast, Mali, Tanzania and Senegal. Randgold is now trying to acquire Ashanti Goldfields, a bigger company, but Mr. Hathaway said the possibility of the merger's completion was remote. He first bought the company's American depository receipts in 2001 and has paid $9.77, on average, for the position; the A.D.R.'s now trade at $13.20. They sold for a premium of about 34 percent at the end of July.

The company has a strong balance sheet, Mr. Hathaway said, and assets in West Africa, which he called an "exciting exploration frontier." He projected that the company would produce about 340,000 ounces of gold this year, with current reserves that can last nearly nine years.

R. HATHAWAY began buying A.D.R.'s of Gold Fields Ltd., a South African gold company, in 1998. Gold Fields explores, develops and mines gold ore deposits in South Africa, Ghana and Australia. Mr. Hathaway estimated that production this year would exceed four million ounces, with potential production for 60 years. He described Gold Fields as "world class," with the "highest-quality, longest-lived mines in the world."

He paid $10.47, on average, for the A.D.R.'s, which now trade at $12.70. They sold for a premium of 60 percent at the end of July.

The fund's biggest holding is Placer Dome, the gold producer based in Vancouver, British Columbia. The company has mining interests worldwide, including in Canada, Chile and the United States. Mr. Hathaway called it an "unloved laggard which has substantial value." Investors have shunned the company, he said, since its 1999 acquisition of Getchell Gold. Getchell is just resuming production, and many investors think that Placer Dome paid too much for the company. But the current share price, he said, already reflects that opinion. In July, the shares' premium was 34 percent.

The fund began buying the stock in 1998, paying $10.31 a share, on average. It now trades at $13.07.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/25/2003 9:48:19 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Global Oomph?

By Stephen Roach (New York)

morganstanley.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (26050)8/25/2003 10:44:39 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Bush Gives Bond Investors Reasons to Doubt Deficit Will Drop
_____________________________

Aug. 25 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. President George W. Bush has given the bond market at least half a dozen reasons to tumble, and the 10-year note and other U.S. Treasuries have obliged with the biggest two-month decline in two decades.

``There are clear doubts in the bond market that Bush can pull off a recovery and lower the deficit,'' said David Brownlee, who helps manage $7 billion in bonds at National Life Investment Management Co. in Montpelier, Vermont. The government will shoulder ``a high deficit for quite a while.''

The 10-year note has dropped 7 percent since the start of July, the largest decline in any two-month period since 1983. The yield reached its highest in a year for 10-year notes. Yields on the two-year and 30-year Treasuries also hit highs for the year earlier this month.

Bush's troop commitments are spread from Afghanistan to Iraq and now Liberia. His tax cuts are adding to a record U.S. deficit exceeding $400 billion. And his efforts to stimulate the economy haven't created jobs to offset the drop in tax receipts.

The 2003 deficit, which the Bush administration estimates will be $455 billion at the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30, is about 4.6 percent of the $10 trillion economy. Next year's deficit is forecast to reach $475 billion and those projections don't include all the costs for the occupation of Iraq. At that level, the deficit may amount to a higher proportion of national output than the $290 billion deficit of 1992. The 1992 shortfall, a record at the time, was 4.7 percent of GDP.

Calculations by the Brookings Institution show that a deficit equal to 1 percent of gross domestic product raises long-term interest rates by 30 basis points, said Peter Orszag, a fiscal policy expert at Brookings, an independent, non-partisan research organization based in Washington. He forecasts a long-term deficit of about 3 percent of GDP.

Interest Rates

As the Treasury sells debt to finance the deficit, the expanding supply of bonds pushes interest rates higher, constraining consumer spending, mortgage borrowing and corporate investment.

``Any more big moves in the deficit up will create a problem,'' said Steve Kellner, who oversees $48 billion of investment-grade corporate debt at Prudential Investment Management.

The government will have to almost double its borrowing during the year beginning Oct. 1 to finance its debt, according to estimates by Barclays Capital Inc. The Treasury will have to sell a total of $940 billion in securities in order to refinance $493 billion in coupon debt and raise $447 billion in new cash, Barclays said.

Stimulus

The 10-year Treasury's yield is expected to increase to 5 percent by the fourth quarter of 2004 from 4.47 percent on Friday, according to the average forecast of 52 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

``As far as the Treasury goes, their deficits will be growing for some time,'' said James Evans, who helps invest $15 billion of bonds at Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. in New York. ``Most investors figure there will be stimulus up the wazoo to get employment growth.''

Deficit concerns are overblown, said Kevin Hassett, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, an independent, non- profit research organization in Washington. ``You'd rather not have a deficit, but it's not going to have the doom that some people are forecasting,'' he said. ``There's not really much evidence that indebtedness changes anything.''

Finding Jobs

Bush, who entered the White House with a federal surplus of $127 billion for fiscal 2001, said the deficit is chiefly the result of a recession in 2001 and the cost of war in Iraq and can be cut in half over the next five years if Congress holds down long-term spending. He said that after initially adding to the deficit, his tax cuts are intended to bolster the economy.

``I am more concerned about somebody finding a job than about numbers on paper,'' Bush told reporters Friday.

The U.S. lost 44,000 jobs in July, a sixth straight decline, the government reported earlier this month. Almost 2 million jobs have been lost since Bush took office in January 2001.

A ``jobless recovery'' may lead consumers to hold off on spending, slowing growth. The rise in mortgage rates -- a percentage point over the past month -- has ``taken the wind out of the refinancing boom,'' also threatening spending, said Robert Parry, president of the San Francisco Fed Bank.

There are some signs of a recovery, with the economy expanding 2.4 percent in the second quarter, and that also plays against the bond market by raising the risk of inflation eroding the value of fixed-income investments. No help is likely from the Federal Reserve, which has indicated it won't raise the benchmark interest rate any time soon to stave off inflation.

No Help From Fed

The economy will need ``more than a few quarters'' of strong growth to reduce unemployment and excess capacity, so Federal Reserve policy makers intend to leave rates at 45-year low of 1 percent to boost growth and ward off deflation, Parry said Friday at a speech in San Diego.

Bush has said the $1.7 trillion in tax cuts since he took office will spur sustained growth, increase tax revenue, and pare the deficit by early next year, months before the November presidential election.

``If all the stimulus that's in the pipeline isn't enough to get this economy going, then I think the president's going to be in political trouble,'' said Stephen Stanley, an economist at RBS Greenwich Capital in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Costs in Iraq

Deficit projections don't include all the costs of occupying Iraq, now running at an estimated $4 billion per month. The projections for the occupation over the next three years range from $100 billion to $600 billion, said Representative Peter Hoekstra, a Michigan Republican on the House budget committee.

``Iraq is a big part of the deficit number and the reason for the skittish market outlook,'' said Ken Anderson, who helps manage $65 billion in bonds at Evergreen Investments in Charlotte.

With U.S. peacekeeping in Afghanistan costing $950 million each month, annual war costs already total about $50 billion.

``That's a significant amount of money,'' equivalent to about one-half percent of GDP, said Steven Koziak, a defense analyst at the non-partisan Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment. Lawmakers in the House and Senate are unlikely to heed Bush's calls for ``fiscal discipline'' prior to the 2004 elections, said Paul Samuelson, a Nobel laureate and economic adviser to President John F. Kennedy and other Democratic chief executives.

Congressional Spending

``An election year is not a time to count on limited spending by Congress,'' Samuelson said.

Both Democrats and Republicans are advocating a program to subsidize prescription drugs that could cost more than $400 billion during the next decade. Also, the Bush administration has yet to include in its deficit estimates the cost of stabilizing Liberia and achieving peace and economic renewal in Iraq.

Bush's forecasts that the federal deficit will register $200 billion at a minimum at least until 2008 are ``fanciful without a fairly major tax increase, which politically isn't likely,'' said Robert Reischauer, president of the Urban Institute and a former Republican-appointed director of the Congressional Budget Office.

``We're probably, realistically, looking at $400 billion deficits as far as the eye can see,'' he said.

Last Updated: August 25, 2003 00:15 EDT