SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (13139)8/24/2003 11:47:50 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 306849
 
Because it isn't just an issue of the schools getting money, the issue is that Prop 13 requires a 2/3 majority which is much more than a majority to raise taxes, and the local residents feel they are dogged by the ghosts of prop 13 from 25 years ago and we have no control.

Why should ONE long time resident be able to override 2 of my newer resident tech worker votes on tax issues. I should say this applies to any issue too. One person, one vote doesn't that make sense? Whoever has the majority, wins.

Business usually opposes taxes and yet in this state, business wants tax laws overturned. The reason is because the tech workforce is marginalized by these tax laws.



To: GraceZ who wrote (13139)8/25/2003 6:34:21 PM
From: David JonesRespond to of 306849
 
re....why didn't they....

They needed a one time write off?
What I felt at the time and still is it was a topic that was popular and a crack in the state constitution to get all voter bonds passed with simple majority. "a tangled weave..."
The Fire and Police are backing legislation to allow bonds related to safety to pass with simple majority now. "55% vs 66.6%" And other bills are moving to basically repel the majority rule for all taxes.
We are under assault here.