Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (4602)	8/26/2003 3:28:24 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

two sides to every story (or) Chris & Bux "off sides" . Dear Christopher, . Please excuse me if the "message" i append to this post seems incorrect or taken out of context, or simply does not deliver the message you want. But then your post is not about a message delivered, but that same old same attempt by those whom joined Silicon Investor and/or InvestorsHub AFTER reading AND agreeing to the TOU which includes a statement saying that they can be changed at any time by management(currently owners,) and your acceptance places the decide for you to be "happy" and remain an active member, on YOU, not the site. . But no, its the same old same cry by those like you that want to reverse the order and try and "force" the web site to agree with and carry out YOUR instructions of context & content of site's existance. . "...there are two sides to every story. So I hope you or Matt will post the other side and let the members decide... we'll decide." . Yes Virginia, . BobZ & Sheriff Matt do not take sides, but run a business that allocates space & means on a message board web site to allow those that have payed, to present their sides. . Dear Christopher, . Most all did not read Bux's "too" long post to BobZ to reached what is the closing argrument, i place it here to make a note of a heads-up to anyone thinking that your request for a reply can be met with anything except an "off sides" and not have these two message boards slip slide down a slipperly slope into that place where the inmates make the rules. . [start.] ... this is Matt's way of snuffing out posters... he [Matt] used to be one [hypesters] himself. ... [has] no place [in] forum [to] openly discuss issues... It's really quite frustrating after I spent a considerable sum for the privilege of joining Ihub and now I realize I have wasted the subscription money as I can only post at the whim of the 19 year old moderator [using] gutter talk as he gets his jollies off and then ends the dialogue... Bux doug

To: The Philosopher who wrote (4602)	8/26/2003 11:53:27 AM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Chris, thanks for your interest. It's much better to have someone like yourself who is interested in what actually happened than someone like Doug A K who has a long history of assuming Matt can do no wrong. I doubt Matt or Bob will respond as they really don't have a case. I know you would assume there is another side to the story but I have told all that I can think of in a balanced manner. You can check my over 800 posts on Ihub, I stay on-topic and above the name-calling and personal attacks. If you read the post that got me suspended you will see that I was simply pointing out that the share price drop was likely attributable to the fact that Jim finally "came clean" last weekend that he had sold all his IDCC back in July. I hope it's ok to say "came clean" here on SI ;-) And, sure enough, the share price is still dropping and I am denied use of the service that I paid to use. I have no real recourse either as a lawyer would cost far more than I paid for the membership in the first place. Very frustrating. Bux