Hi marcos, While High & Buy of pennies has so far
left me Hight & Dry, i'am not willing yet to say Bye & Hide.
.
But thats the desert dirt story you and E.C. have bashed,
like forever, and with no middle ground possible for you two.
.
So it seems most all of us have what appears to others
a stand that includes only one place to put one's feet,
and anyone standing elsewhere is totally 100% wrong
and should wise up or leave or as your said s-t-f-u.
.
Who is right and who is wrong can be an issue by degrees,
especially when one side has the power, or more power,
or simply can get their way by showing the other person
"the way out the door."
.
But your reply to Once touched on a simple fact, something
that has been out in plain view from day 1 of these recent posts
between Bux[Once] and the external iHub's Sheriff Matt.
.
HINT:
Message from marcos...
... what you[Bux] post here i see no sign of openness [stop.]
.
GOSH, That was short for a gotmilkSpeak reference point :o)
(or)
Bux et al accuse Matt of repeating over and over his stand,
that they say includes no effort to listen and acknowledge
that they have a valid point that needs to be addressed.
.
Well, seems to me that Bux et al are doing the same stand
that they say Matt is doing, that being an issue one has
with another is unresolved. .
.
Now this is all true and has been mentioned over and over.
.
Nothing new so far, especially the point that Matt is exercising
his power to deal with this conflict in a manner deemed to be
in the best for iHub's business plan.
.
Rather than use that term "damage control" which includes
a state of damage to be present, Matt as i see it is acting
in a way to prevent a state where he has to select from
a list of actions that he thinks will inflict the least damage
to iHub, knowing that some will be done.
.
Let me replace "damage control" with "control damage"
as an action Matt is doing. This is difference in that the
degree of damage done has not addition damage attached,
being that selection of lessor of two evils.
.
The conclusion here is that Matt is willing to allow Bux
and his tag team of misguided followers to "rot" on Si
rather than do what he and BobZ have strongly stated
as "not in the cards," being transfer official ADMIN duties
across the Si/iHub train tracks. It should be clear that the
reason why Bux will not take his case to iHub's jailhouse
is that he knows what Matt will do and say, and its almost
identical to what Matt has referenced here using an indirection
to what happened, or would happen, on the iHub side.
.
To say this using different words,
Bux knows that his posts are pushing the pro-IDCC
folks on the iHub board closer and closer
to the edge of the Valley of Irresponsibility
that leads into the Forest of Irretrievability
where seeing the trees v. forest is not an issue
because its pitch dark there and the only sense available
is to heard the voice(posts) of Once telling them "its over,"
just like macros & Erica Chatters tell'n about desert dirt.
.
But Matt does not want the situation to get to that point:
of
"damage control"
Meaning,
Take actions to replace that potential:
with
"control damage"
as a new environment, or simple "state of affairs."
.
Bux knows that he will not be about in iHub's Jailhouse
to accomplish his task/agenda/dream/wants,
so yes,
Bux will not go where he is already "defeated."
.
So now its the game to cause Matt discomfort here on Si.
.
But that only works if Matt is willing to enter that game,
that game where Bux gets Matt to run in circles chasing
his own tail that Bux places them "shame shame shame"
tags onto.
.
This is why Bux remains here on Si, fart'n upwind.
.
Matt holds his iHub "ground,"
while Bux tries to get Matt to walk and walk into that valley.
.
Now "whats clear"
.
BobZ + Sheriff Matt have created a business.
(aka) created something of value (self esteem & paycheck)
Bux & mmMary types also have the ability to do the same,
but they choose a different path,
a path that excludes Honest & Hard Work being required
and being the deciding factor, but "taking advantage"
and feeding on others misfortune are faster and quicker
way to accomplish that state of being successful.
.
Rather than say "sad to say," its more of a condition
that those who arrive in the Bux & mmMary success,
final chapter of story, obtain an emptyness of "self.'
.
Bottom line it comes down to those that create success
versus those that did not obtain it because they took
a short-cut around that honest and hard work pathway.
.
There is a sad element here, as those like BobZ & Matt
that create something of value will be attacked by those
of Bux et al that get a negative reflection of themselves
everytime they view these correct success stories, where
their reaction is to liminate/destroy/remove/monkey-wrench
these places of created value, and its "not personal" really,
but just their misguided survival instincts to fight & attack
whatever seems to place them in danger, or at risk.
.
This is the extra sadness beside what the true creators
have to fight, as they who want to destroy what others
have created in a correct manner, are really working against
what they sense as danger, as in they ignore that they themselves
are the bearer of incorrectness, and this they receive
in the reverse reflection of the good workers. So rather
than accept that "they have done wrong" and correct themselves,
they work to remove that which tells them they are incorrect.
.
Thus they destroy what the creators made.
.
Try too.
.
As for Bux, he want unconditional power on iHub to post
in the manner he has, that being to inflict chaos onto anything
he sees as being a reward for others. In this case its IDCC
where long term suffering holders may be their investment back.
.
Why IDCC?
.
Nothing personal to Bux, it just happen to appear
in front of him having people suffering and in pain.
Bux has nothing personal against IDCC,
or for that matter, the longs with it.
All that matters to Bux is that others may be successful,
that success in any form is that mirror he sees himself
as a loser or phony or one that got success without being
the one really responsible to it obtain'ation using honest
and hard work.
.
It easy to obtain others misfortune when they fall and whatever
that had of value is available to others (ie) Si to iHub,
but the receiving end still needs to know that they
got there using an honest hard work method to be able
to receive another lost and still have high self esteem.
.
To Bux its not that Hurt & Pain,
but Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail
to everything of value not his.
.
(extra)
You say WHAT
"... Digr back onto iHub"
(i say)
While i'am trying to get him terminated from Si?
investorshub.com
d:oug |
