SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (73628)8/29/2003 9:53:36 AM
From: average joe  Respond to of 82486
 
They're not intellectually dishonest, they're just contrary.



To: Lane3 who wrote (73628)8/29/2003 1:13:35 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I just finished watching that documentary about the homosexuals with families who were politically active against gay acceptance. I thought it was extremely interesting and well done and I recommend it to anyone who might be interested. It was low key, thoughtful, seemingly balanced, and respectful of all the participants.

It was sad to see the family estrangements, though. The pain seemed to be greater of the side of the homosexuals. No way to know if that was the actual case or if that was an editing bias. I did get one useful insight, the observation made by the narrator and a couple of participants that the fundamentalist Christian families took the position that they did because their beliefs were that the point of this life is only to position people to get into the next one and their priority was for their children to get to heaven. That's a POV I can understand even as I consider it misdirected.



To: Lane3 who wrote (73628)8/30/2003 7:39:22 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I don't think they're being intellectually dishonest. Maybe they want to have a public debate on the evolution of the 14th Amendment.

The Privileges and Immunities Clause of the 14th amendment got "reinterpreted" into nothingness in The Slaughter-House Cases.

tourolaw.edu

(check the dissents)