Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bux who wrote (4741)	9/1/2003 1:35:45 AM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 5315

Yes Virginia, Bux did 1 step forward, 5 backwards. . Hopefully its becoming more clear to those honest folks that have decided to stand behind Bux in what really is a stand for truth & honest behavior using common sense, rather than force and intimidation, have glimpsed into what is being showned as Bux's true nature. . The Bux(s) of the world display the rights people acting in good faith use to continue their unimpeded activity to engage in open and honest manners both socially and in commerce because the Bux(s) learned long ago that if these rights are threatened, then the good people will speak up against these attacks, in their own interest. . All the Bux(s) need do is cloak their evil agendas using good people to rally around them to help fight off attacks, that if successful, will eventually harm them and loved ones. . Sadly too late these good people realize that they have accomplished just the opposite result expected, as once again this Bux type of an iHub's Once has again used the good to help the bad fight the good. . Once the Bux enters the inners of a business like iHub, and obtains the freedom wanted to do his evil acts, then iHub has allowed that Trojan Horse to enter, a structure build by the good & honest intentions of folks that thought they were defending themselves against what, they realize too late, were the Bux(s) they helped. . Message #4741 from Bux at Aug 31, 2003 8:37 PM The user agreement says that Ihub reserves the right to remove any post that clearly detracts from the value of the community. Not only was it not "clear" that my post detracted from... ... but more importantly, it doesn't say such posts are a violation of the TOU. [stop.] . Bux Bux Bux , . Investors Hub - User Agreement - Updated 5/1/03 investorshub.com --- ... in violation of the User Agreement or clearly detracts from the value of the community... [stop.] --- This is the only single step forward you taken, and it has near zero substance to support your case, and only goes to show that BobZ & Sheriff Matt's ability to examine and correct fuzzy English is in need of help :o) . Hint: Not good to make a point using a reference that is a reference to itself. Like an Error Routine handling an error that it itself makes, by Call'n itself is apples & oranges, but mentioned for BobZ :o) (but) "... in violation of the [TOU] or clearly detracts from the value of the community" (needs) Better "C++ Pointers" as it appears that something is referenced that contains something that is itself external to that something :o) . But REALLY Bux, . Might an instance of: "or clearly detracts from the value of the community" NOT be a "thing" but a "description" of the event: "Violation of the User Agreement (TOU)" (or) Any "Violation of the User Agreement (TOU)" is a descriptor pointing to the "ERROR" "clearly detracts from the value of the community" (aka) value of iHub sustaining itself as a business . ok? Note: I was gonna add a comment to that "clear" not being made "clear" to you, but only to Matt, that while also existed Matt's notification to you that Matt made the clear "clear" decision to satisfy the TOU fully with the additional notification to you. (but, enough is now too mulch :o) D:oug having more fun that pulling wings off house flies