Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (4759)	9/2/2003 12:12:36 PM
From: Bux	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5315

Bob, I already mailed the violations to him using the proper form on Ihub. I did this within 20 minutes of the offending posts in most cases. He choose to do nothing about them at the time. Now that the insults and attacks have hung out to dry for many weeks, I don't mind them being there. No one is going to read them now. Why should I have to do the legwork all over again by digging up the links when Matt is the one who decided not to delete them (or discipline the authors) when the violations happened? What's troubling is that he didn't discipline the authors of those attacks on me but he is quick to manufacture kangaroo charges on me. He has a double standard which is a big problem seeing how he is the cop, judge, jury and jailer. That might be fine if people didn't pay to subscribe but many did. At the time I sent the $129 in I felt good because I thought I was helping to support the site. There is a new fool born every minute but I never imagined I would become that fool. Like I said, a lot more needs fixing at Ihub than just the source code. Bux