SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (73968)9/5/2003 10:29:52 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 82486
 
I am not trying to take the burden off the man. If there is ambiguity, I think that he should be charged with sexual assault, which is, I think, a sufficient penalty for having failed to ascertain consent, as opposed to clear indifference to the woman's volition and willingness to employ indisputable coercion to get his way.........



To: epicure who wrote (73968)9/9/2003 9:34:51 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
The burden should be on the man to make sure he has consent

That sounds like guilty until proven innocent.

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News