SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (7480)9/10/2003 12:07:09 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793803
 
Dean is bad news for Israel. In fact, for all facets of our FP.

DEAN FLIPS ON ISRAEL
By DEBORAH ORIN - [New York Post]

September 10, 2003 -- BALTIMORE - Under fire from pro-Israel leaders, Democratic 2004 front-runner Howard Dean last night retreated from his statement that America shouldn't "take sides" in the Mideast, and said he backs a "special relationship" with Israel.

"We've had a special relationship with Israel," Dean said at a Democratic debate last night, insisting, "I don't mean any such thing" as changing America's support for Israel or cutting aid.

Dean's switch came after his demand that Israel withdraw from an "enormous number" of settlements drew fire from Jewish leaders and praise from an Arab-American leader.

Rival Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) charged at the debate that Dean is "not standing by our values." He added that Dean actually took sides - but against Israel - by demanding withdrawal from settlements instead of leaving that to negotiation.

Dean shot back, "I'm disappointed in Joe - my position on Israel is exactly the same as Bill Clinton's."

Lieberman retorted, "Not so," and Dean sounded annoyed as he complained, "I didn't interrupt you" and warned against trying "to demagogue this issue."

It's the first debate where Dean got testy.

Lieberman was the only rival to take hard shots at Dean for the second debate in a row. Former front-runner Sen. John Kerry (Mass.), whose campaign seems stalled, made no waves.

Both the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and the Anti- Defamation League challenged Dean's earlier Mideast remarks as a break with longtime U.S. policy of backing Israel.

But James Zogby, president of the Arab-American Institute, said, "Dean is right" and criticism of his remarks amounts to "pandering."

It was the first debate since President Bush's Iraq speech Sunday, and eight of the nine candidates ducked the question of whether they'd vote for the $87 billion that Bush is seeking for Iraq. Only long-shot Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) said no.

The others seemed uncomfortable, stressing that they want to make sure they support troops in harm's way, even as they blasted Bush. Dean at one point contended, "I think this president doesn't understand defense."

Nor did any of the top Democratic contenders call for pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq.

nypost.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (7480)9/10/2003 2:09:21 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793803
 
Naturally, one would have to assume that the Pal PM is not a total stooge to Arafat in order for Arafat to be undermined by funding of the PM's office. Perhaps Abu Mazen could have done it if he had been funded. Won't be able to tell now.

Are you aware of any other Pal figures who might present a credible challenge to Arafat if sufficiently empowered?