Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (74362)	9/10/2003 6:51:56 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Our masseur, IMO, needs to look out for his own reaction, not that of his clients." I heartily disagree. "The point of a massage is therapy, not arousal, unless it's one of "those" massage parlors. " Exactly. So the responsible masseuse who recieves a flirtatious client saying stuff like, "do me dude," while in a state of obvious arousal, would not be performing according to the point of the massage therapy and should end the session as a matter of professional ethics. Not simply deny any responsibility in the matter as you suggest, and carry on knowing that he is performing sex parlor services.