SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (7580)9/11/2003 4:56:50 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793757
 
I spotted this, and said, "This is Karen's kind of story!

Lax immigration laws blamed for 9/11 deaths
By James G. Lakely - Washington Times
Published September 11, 2003

Federal officials "contributed to the murders" of those killed in the September 11 attacks by failing to tighten immigration laws, relatives of some victims said yesterday.
Members of "9/11 Families for a Secure America" and Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, used the second anniversary of the hijackings that killed more than 3,000 people in New York City, the Pentagon and Pennsylvania to make their point.
"All the 9/11 family members know that their loved ones died because the government failed to live up to its most basic obligation to its citizens: to protect them from foreign attack," said Peter Gadiel, whose son was killed at the World Trade Center. "I say on behalf of my son and the other 3,000 dead and their families, that not only is Congress guilty of contributing to these deaths, but, unwilling to enact reforms, you will have on your hands the blood of the victims of the next 9/11."
The lobbying group and Mr. Tancredo have been pushing for tighter immigration laws since the attacks, and lamented the lack of progress. They blamed Congress, President Bush, his father, and former President Bill Clinton for failing to offer "leadership in securing our borders."
They attributed the lack of legislative action to monitor and control the flow of the estimated 10 million illegal immigrants in the United States to a powerful pro-immigration lobby and "unscrupulous business people" who profit from cheap immigrant labor.
"Those who oppose us resort to calling us anti-immigrant or racist. This is just a lie," said Grace Godshalk, whose son phoned from the south tower of the World Trade Center minutes before the second plane smashed into the building, striking a few floors below him.
"We are not anti-immigrant. We are pro-security," she said. "The open-borders interest groups have proven their willingness to sacrifice the security of all Americans and the lives of thousands for the purposes of their own gain."
In an e-mail sent out yesterday, the National Immigration Forum decried the "use of the second anniversary of the September 11 attacks to drum up support for nativist immigration policies."
Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said connecting the 19 hijackers to "hard-working Mexicans" who want to come to the United States was a manipulation of the immigration debate.
"Let's just say that what's needed is a reasoned and serious debate about solutions, and appeals to fear and emotion go in the opposite direction," Mr. Sharry said. "We have to isolate terrorists, not America."
Mr. Sharry said the solution to stemming illegal immigration and protecting the United States from terrorists is to be found in closer monitoring of immigrants, not sealing off the border.
"Finding [more] legal channels for immigrants so that they are screened and we know who's here is the better way to go," Mr. Sherry said. "If we think that the inspector at Dulles airport is the front line of the war on terrorism, we've already lost."
Mr. Tancredo said several of the September 11 hijackers had gained entry to the United States on student visas and "melted into society" thanks to lax monitoring of their status by the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the schools they were supposed to be attending.
"Why, after all this time, have we ignored the front door of homeland security? Politics." Mr. Tancredo said. He said Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge told him "political and cultural problems" prevent the United States from stationing the National Guard at the borders.
Mrs. Godshalk said Mr. Bush's request to Congress for $87 billion to help secure and rebuild Iraq was a sign that priorities are out of order.
"Bring back our troops. Secure our borders," she said.
California Gov. Gray Davis, Democrat, also came under attack for signing a bill that would allow illegal aliens to obtain driver's licenses, what Mr. Tancredo called "the keys to the kingdom."
"This is idiotic," Mr. Tancredo said. "Are we going to allow every locality to come up with its own immigration policy?"
Mr. Tancredo said he has introduced a bill that would cut off federal highway aid to any state that issues driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. He said he will contact state attorneys general to "tell them of the dangers of such policies."
Mr. Gadiel said the new California policy may make that state's licenses invalid as identification for air travel. "If people in California can no longer get on airplanes, they will see that it is a good idea to get rid of that law," he said.


The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com

Lax immigration laws blamed for 9/11 deaths
By James G. Lakely
Published September 11, 2003

Federal officials "contributed to the murders" of those killed in the September 11 attacks by failing to tighten immigration laws, relatives of some victims said yesterday.
Members of "9/11 Families for a Secure America" and Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, used the second anniversary of the hijackings that killed more than 3,000 people in New York City, the Pentagon and Pennsylvania to make their point.
"All the 9/11 family members know that their loved ones died because the government failed to live up to its most basic obligation to its citizens: to protect them from foreign attack," said Peter Gadiel, whose son was killed at the World Trade Center. "I say on behalf of my son and the other 3,000 dead and their families, that not only is Congress guilty of contributing to these deaths, but, unwilling to enact reforms, you will have on your hands the blood of the victims of the next 9/11."
The lobbying group and Mr. Tancredo have been pushing for tighter immigration laws since the attacks, and lamented the lack of progress. They blamed Congress, President Bush, his father, and former President Bill Clinton for failing to offer "leadership in securing our borders."
They attributed the lack of legislative action to monitor and control the flow of the estimated 10 million illegal immigrants in the United States to a powerful pro-immigration lobby and "unscrupulous business people" who profit from cheap immigrant labor.
"Those who oppose us resort to calling us anti-immigrant or racist. This is just a lie," said Grace Godshalk, whose son phoned from the south tower of the World Trade Center minutes before the second plane smashed into the building, striking a few floors below him.
"We are not anti-immigrant. We are pro-security," she said. "The open-borders interest groups have proven their willingness to sacrifice the security of all Americans and the lives of thousands for the purposes of their own gain."
In an e-mail sent out yesterday, the National Immigration Forum decried the "use of the second anniversary of the September 11 attacks to drum up support for nativist immigration policies."
Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said connecting the 19 hijackers to "hard-working Mexicans" who want to come to the United States was a manipulation of the immigration debate.
"Let's just say that what's needed is a reasoned and serious debate about solutions, and appeals to fear and emotion go in the opposite direction," Mr. Sharry said. "We have to isolate terrorists, not America."
Mr. Sharry said the solution to stemming illegal immigration and protecting the United States from terrorists is to be found in closer monitoring of immigrants, not sealing off the border.
"Finding [more] legal channels for immigrants so that they are screened and we know who's here is the better way to go," Mr. Sherry said. "If we think that the inspector at Dulles airport is the front line of the war on terrorism, we've already lost."
Mr. Tancredo said several of the September 11 hijackers had gained entry to the United States on student visas and "melted into society" thanks to lax monitoring of their status by the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the schools they were supposed to be attending.
"Why, after all this time, have we ignored the front door of homeland security? Politics." Mr. Tancredo said. He said Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge told him "political and cultural problems" prevent the United States from stationing the National Guard at the borders.
Mrs. Godshalk said Mr. Bush's request to Congress for $87 billion to help secure and rebuild Iraq was a sign that priorities are out of order.
"Bring back our troops. Secure our borders," she said.
California Gov. Gray Davis, Democrat, also came under attack for signing a bill that would allow illegal aliens to obtain driver's licenses, what Mr. Tancredo called "the keys to the kingdom."
"This is idiotic," Mr. Tancredo said. "Are we going to allow every locality to come up with its own immigration policy?"
Mr. Tancredo said he has introduced a bill that would cut off federal highway aid to any state that issues driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. He said he will contact state attorneys general to "tell them of the dangers of such policies."
Mr. Gadiel said the new California policy may make that state's licenses invalid as identification for air travel. "If people in California can no longer get on airplanes, they will see that it is a good idea to get rid of that law," he said.

dynamic.washtimes.com



To: KLP who wrote (7580)9/11/2003 7:40:49 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793757
 
Voters remember "The Mikado" "I've got a little list, and none of them will be missed."

Daniel Weintraub: Voter wrath now veering toward state Legislature
By Daniel Weintraub -- Bee Columnist - (Published September 7, 2003)

The recall election freight train chugging down the tracks toward Gov. Gray Davis might not stop with him. If it succeeds, the state Legislature, which is just as responsible for California's woes as Davis, could be the next target.

A recent poll by the Public Policy Institute of California found that the people's assessment of the Legislature was even lower than their regard for the governor. While 25 percent said they approved of the job Davis is doing, just 22 percent gave high marks to the Legislature. And while 20 percent approved of the way Davis was handling the budget, an even more minuscule 15 percent could say the same for the Legislature.

The voters cannot recall the Legislature en masse, though many have expressed to me their desire to do so. But they can take out their frustrations on individual lawmakers up for reelection next year. And with a little encouragement from the people behind the recall, they could even "cut their pay and send them home" by passing a ballot measure to return to the days of a part-time Legislature.

I doubt that part-timers would be any better than the supposed professionals we have now. But they couldn't be much worse. The current Democratic majority seems to see itself as a tool of organized labor, lawyers and the Indian casinos, among others, while the Republicans often let ideology blind them to compromise that might actually improve the state's economic climate.

The good news is that the voters' rage is starting to penetrate the Capitol's thick stone walls. You wouldn't necessarily know it by the product spewing forth these days, but a handful of lawmakers have been meeting quietly in hopes of offering a set of reforms before the public does the job for them.

"I think people are frustrated," said Democrat Assemblyman Joe Canciamilla of Contra Costa County, one of the body's more thoughtful members. "I think they are angry. I think they're disgusted. Unfortunately, the way we do things in California, we just decide we are mad and strike back. We do some really dumb things. I think we run the risk of doing that again.

"There is a responsibility on our part to say from the inside, 'We agree. There are some things we need to do to try to fix the system. Here are some possibilities. Here are some options.' "

Among the ideas kicking around are moving the job of drawing of district lines to an independent commission so that lawmakers can no longer manipulate the process to eliminate political competition. This would be a huge step toward reducing the partisan polarization that plagues the place today.

Canciamilla said the group might also support a proposal for an open primary, which would allow voters, regardless of party registration, to decide on Election Day which party primary they want to vote in. Other options include internal reforms of the Legislature's rules, including limits on fund-raising during certain times of the year and changes in the way lawmakers deal with lobbyists.

Of course, this is the same group of moderates who met earlier this year to try to fashion a bipartisan budget solution. That plan received the support of exactly two members: Canciamilla and Republican Assemblyman Keith Richman of Northridge. It's not clear if this effort will fare any better.

But it might. One of the candidates for Assembly speaker, Joe Nation of Marin County, says that if elected, he would push for the kind of reforms the group is discussing. Nation also wants to further limit the number of bills Assembly members carry and the number of committees on which they serve.

"I think we have made some mistakes over the last few years," Nation told me. "We have slowly gotten into a place right now where we don't work very well. We need to have fewer committees, smaller committees. In the old days members sat on three committees. You'd develop some expertise. I know one member now who is on three committees at the same time every Tuesday morning."

That might sound like inside baseball, but it goes to the heart of the Legislature's dysfunction. Members want to spread themselves thin to increase their influence over as many issues as possible, and thus their ability to raise money. With thousands of bills in the hopper and too many members on too many committees, lawmakers are rushed to vote on matters of which they know almost nothing. The place becomes a bill machine for the interest groups with hardly any independent thought from the members.

I don't think a part-time Legislature is the right answer for what ails the Capitol. But if these and other reforms are not adopted soon, it might be the answer we get.



To: KLP who wrote (7580)9/15/2003 4:47:35 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793757
 
Karen, you can chew on this when you get back from your cruise.




Candidates: Immigration and Mexico Here to Stay
By Frank del Olmo
Frank del Olmo is associate editor of The Times.

September 14, 2003

Immigration is back as a campaign issue in California, and that's a good thing even if it gives assorted political extremists the chance to be demagogues on a very complex topic. A Times poll conducted last week found that one in six California voters consider immigration an important issue for whoever emerges as California's governor after the Oct. 7 recall election.

Of course, anyone who follows immigration knows the topic never really went away after 1995, when Proposition 187, which would have barred illegal immigrants from public services, was tossed out by the courts. The particularly anti-Mexican tone of the campaign for that popular but misguided initiative riled up a batch of new Latino voters, who turned on the Republican politicians most closely identified with 187.

Since then, conservatives would have you believe that this still-growing Latino electorate makes any discussion of immigration politically incorrect.

But that's a canard put forth by a few proponents of extreme "solutions" to California immigration problems, like militarizing our borders or new deportation campaigns like those of the 1930s and 1950s.

Such simplistic schemes deserve to be relegated to the fringe of political discourse because they are unrealistic and distract from the discussion of more subtle but potentially workable proposals, such as a guest-worker program with Mexico.

For all the political flak Gov. Gray Davis is getting for having signed the bill allowing illegal immigrants to get a driver's license — many analysts concluded he was pandering to Latino voters — a good argument can be made that the governor is just taking one small step to resolve one small facet of the state's immigration dilemma.

Even if we all agree that illegal immigrants should not be here, the reality is that they are here, filling low-wage or dead-end jobs. And many of them are getting to and from work the same way thousands of other California residents do, in automobiles. So it is only practical to make sure those immigrant motorists are legally identified and know the rules of the road before they get behind the wheel. Backers of the driver's license law, including an auto insurance industry that has no radical agenda, believe it will make California's streets safer, and they're right.

In the same way, the decision by dozens of local governments, including Los Angeles, to accept Mexican consular ID cards — the so-called matriculas — is a reasonable way to identify and bring into the open a large group of people who might otherwise be hiding in the shadows.

These are the kinds of nuanced policy prescriptions that should be discussed in the remaining weeks before the recall vote, as Davis and his would-be successors campaign. The candidates must honestly acknowledge that immigration is a federal responsibility, so California cannot solve its immigration problems alone.

They can also talk about steps that state government can take to mitigate immigration's effect. Like pressuring the federal government to pay for the costs associated with illegal immigration. Or reviving the state agency that, in the 1940s, promoted programs that help assimilate immigrants into American life.

Of course, a few political opportunists won't resist the temptation to try to stir up the anti-immigrant bigotry that has often stained California's history. The attacks on Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante because he once belonged to a Latino student group that some critics deem radical fall into this category. It's no coincidence the allegations originated on nativist Web sites that rant against immigration.

But Bustamante should not dismiss the attacks out of hand, because they have raised legitimate concerns in the minds of moderate voters. Instead, he and all serious candidates for governor should take the opportunity to articulate their visions of what this state's relationship with a large and an important neighbor like Mexico should be, and what this state can do to enforce its laws while respecting the rights of otherwise decent and hard-working people.

After all, given geography and a modern global economy, neither Mexico nor all those immigrants are going away.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
latimes.com