Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bux who wrote (19601)	9/11/2003 8:43:44 PM
From: Tom C	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32883

I'm still trying to figure out why you and Matt are on a crusade to try to eliminate anyone who points out the downside of a particular stock and who try to help others identify potential problems with their investments? I don't know about Matt and I don't care what he is doing. As far as MMMary is concerned (on SI) her problem was she thinks she was one who points out the downside of a particular stock and who try(s) to help others identify potential problems with their investments but I never saw that here. She was just a PITA making accusations about the owner of the site, similar to what you are doing now. Bob is running a business. I've seen many a hyping PITA kicked off the site. Maybe that can be a lesson for you. Be you a hyper or a basher if you become a big enough PITA to the business of running the site, you’re out of here. That's just my opinion, I don't speak for Bob in any way. What I find ironic is that there was a time when Bob was accused of favoring the bashers, driving all the "good", "positive" posters off the site. I think your concerns are misplaced. I’m sure there are a lot posters willing to speak out about poor investments. It could be that your opinion of the value you provide is as overrated as the stock you rail against.