SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (74558)9/12/2003 2:58:33 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 82486
 
I just want to add to your disclosure: I have had many massages--from both men and women. they have always taken account of what I did or didn't want covered. Some covered as a matter of course. Others left the decision to me.

Yes, there was one masseuse I would have loved to love...but I, too, have my ethics! :-)



To: Lane3 who wrote (74558)9/12/2003 3:11:41 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I was not really thinking in terms of a therapeutic situation, but just an ordinary masseur giving a massage for pleasure. In any event, I am not sure that the factual question is relevant, since we were talking about the liberty of the masseur to restrict his clientele.......



To: Lane3 who wrote (74558)9/12/2003 4:07:50 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 82486
 
I love my massages. I only have my back done, and they do stick to just my back. It's not sexual at all (imo) it's just really relaxing- like lying in the sun, which I don't find sexual either- thought no doubt there are some people who do.