SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (74606)9/12/2003 4:57:10 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
"thereby revealing that that orientation cannot be the rule, but must be the exception........ "????????????

Why must it be the exception if there are perfectly fine workarounds? Because in this thought experiment there are perfectly fine workarounds- just as there are today, in the real world.



To: Neocon who wrote (74606)9/12/2003 5:01:05 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I am not disputing your notion of handicap, or whatever you called it. That's X, not me. I was only questioning your choosing to justify it with an argument about compensation at the species level. Seems to me that compensation at the individual level is the appropriate argument to use. The species thing is an unnecessary reach, IMO.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News