SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (27651)9/15/2003 10:12:10 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
New York, You’ve Been Used

truthout.org

<<...So what, you may say. September 11 happened. We have to respond. I would answer with the following: First of all, understand that these ideas were formulated well before September 11. These officials within the Bush administration did not cobble these concepts together in the aftermath of that attack, but had them waiting before the attack ever came, and used the attack to bulldog these ruinous policies out into the world. That is disturbing on its face. In a moment, I will share with you the most disturbing part of all. But first, this. A reaction to the September 11 attacks, and to the fringe ideology and the perversion of Islam that motivated them, was and is necessary. Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda are thugs, a protection racket that uses terror instead of Tommy guns. Yet they are heroes to many in the Muslim world. They are not heroes because of what they do. They are heroes because of what we do. They win the hearts and minds of people throughout the world not because of their actions, but because their actions are motivated by our actions.

If we are to win this War on Terror, this new Cold War, we will not do so by bombing decrepit countries and slaughtering Muslim civilians. We will not do so by swaggering across the planet and slapping the international community across the face. In this struggle, I look to one of my favorite Red Sox fans, President John F. Kennedy. Kennedy was by no means a foreign policy prince; he pulled crap that would make Richard Perle blush. Yet Kennedy understood something fundamental about the Cold War struggle, from back when that struggle was as hot and dangerous as it ever got, that resonates in roaring truth today. Kennedy understood that to win the Cold War, America did not simply have to defeat the Soviet Union by force of arms, or threaten to be able to do so. America had to give the rest of the world, especially those regions where communism stood a good chance of taking hold, the belief and understanding that we had a better way. We had to convince the world that were right, and righteous, and though we were not perfect by any means, the hope and goodness of what we represented had to be carried to the corners of the world with something besides a bayonet and a bomb. Hatred of America does not take root when America shows its best face. The bastion of immigration that is New York City proves this beyond doubt. We are not perfect, but we can be very good, and bringing this simple truth to the world will defang these thugs, period.

That is the final failure of this administration, and of these boys from the Project for a New American Century. They believe we can defeat terrorism by kicking ass and taking names, by being violent and unilateral, by basically shoving the worst aspects of our country and our system into the international community’s face and demanding, at gunpoint, that they be with us or against us. Machiavelli said, long ago, that given such a choice, the attacked would always choose to be against. Kicking ass in Iraq, while being exposed as liars and bullies, has proven to be the greatest recruiting poster al Qaeda could have ever asked for. We can defeat these thugs if we go after them properly. We can cut off their funds and their ability to bring in people who will die for the privilege of watching you die. But when we do what we have been doing, when we follow the PNAC plan, we create an unending tide of furious humanity that will, in the end, bury us.

You’ve been used, New York. Your pain and woe has been used to justify a course of action formulated years before those Towers fell. The fear caused by those falling Towers has been used against you, on purpose, to drag us all along on a suicide ride that fulfills the extremist dreams of a tiny minority while filling the coffers of defense and petroleum companies that do not, and will never, have your best interests in mind. Those companies exist to serve themselves, and with the rise of PNAC, they have found their champions. At your expense.

I told you, a moment ago, about the most disturbing part. I told you, also, that these PNAC plans were formulated in that ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ report written long before September 11. I didn’t tell you about page 51 of that report. Page 51 of a report that has become the basis for our war in Iraq, and our new and aggressive foreign policy stance. Page 51 of the report that is now the heart and soul and ideology of this government. Page 51, and one simple sentence: "The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

That was written in September of 2000. It is now September of 2003. Now we have the facts. What are we to do with them? It is not enough to know. We must act...>>



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (27651)9/15/2003 11:29:14 AM
From: abuelita  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
1. owning gold or gold miners
okay, done

2. having limited amount of money in banks
definitely, nota problem

3. having another passport to get far away from USA
not applicable

from this morning's globe & mail:

U.S. DOLLAR LOOKS DIM COMPARED WITH GOLD'S LUSTRE

theglobeandmail.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (27651)9/15/2003 11:46:15 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 89467
 
$10 Trillion in Deficits?
_______________________________

Federal liabilities and accumulated deficits may actually soar by tens of trillions of dollars over the next few decades, leading to fiscal catastrophe, a Congressional expert warns.

FORTUNE
Wednesday, September 10, 2003
By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum

Everyone knows that the federal budget deficit is going to be huge in the next fiscal year: a half-trillion dollars or more. And that's before the $87 billion the President has requested for rebuilding Iraq next year. But over the next few decades, the budget deficit may actually soar tens of trillions of dollars above and beyond that amount--due to largely unaccounted-for costs from entitlement programs, warned Comptroller General David Walker in an interview with Fortune.com this week.

A deficit that high could be a fiscal catastrophe, says Walker, who runs Congress's investigative arm, the General Accounting Office. Most Americans don't know about these liabilities because they don't appear in any of the ten-year estimates that official Washington relies on to write its budgets and to form new policies, says Walker, who is scheduled to give a major address to the National Press Club next Wednesday in Washington, D.C., to warn about the matter. He intends to "issue a wake-up call that we face serious and structural deficits that we need to start doing something about."

Washington experts have been forecasting annual deficits of around $500 billion, but Walker says those numbers don't take into account that, as the Baby Boom starts to retire over the next decade, entitlement programs, especially Social Security, Medicare and veterans health programs, will balloon in cost. "There are tens of trillions of dollars in discounted present value of commitments and obligations that aren't adequately addressed," Walker says. "We would have to have tens of trillions of dollars invested at Treasury rates today to make good on those promises and we just don't have it." And the gap between incoming revenue and expenditures on these programs "is too great to simply grow our way out of the problem," he says. "Tough choices have to made."

Walker declined to give a complete listing of solutions he will suggest next week. But he gave a few hints. For instance, he plans to propose that better, more accurate measurements should be published about the long-term costs of programs now on the books. He also would like to begin "a massive education campaign" to inform the public about these concerns. "One of the biggest problems is that the American public doesn't understand the nature and magnitude of our challenge," he says. As the Baby Boom hits retirement age starting in 2008, "we face a demographic tidal wave that is unprecedented in the history of this country," he says.

How to fix the budget? "We're going to have to look beyond entitlement programs," Walker says. "We're going to have to review and examine a wide range of government activities on the spending side and on the tax side. We need to engage in a fundamental review and reengineering that will take years, and it's important that we start now."

Walker's warning comes at a time when President Bush and Congress have their hands full dealing with short-term problems, particularly rebuilding Iraq, so it's not clear how much impact his comments next week will have. He doesn't have the authority to change laws. But as a high-ranking officer of Congress, his speech will be widely broadcast and is likely to become part of the burgeoning debate about the budget deficits this year. Nonetheless Walker says he hopes his notions will be discussed at some point and "the sooner the better."

fortune.com