SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Orcastraiter who wrote (459164)9/15/2003 6:26:01 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Oh! You FORGOT! That was AFTER Jimmy had said he would never use force to rescue the hostages! Remember that?

That floored me. A President in a situation like that should never even consider such a statement. You want them quaking in their boots every day afraid that you will launch if they DON'T let them loose.

he might have felt more compelled to try another rescue
Carter thought the world was Sunday School and he was its teacher.

But he opted for continued diplomacy, which in the end, resulted in their release
Gee, I thought that the liberal party line was that the Reagan administration bought their freedom with weapons through Iran-Contra.

OTOH, maybe the truth is that they saw a MAN coming into the WH and thought maybe those particular potatoes were a bit TOO hot.

Reagan did nothing except get sworn in, and the hostages were released
Yeah. Because they were worried that his first order might be "Launch!"

That's part of what I mean by being preceded by bad foreign policy, the same kind that installs the Shah in Iran after a bloody coup.
So just which Republican President between LBJ and Carter installed the Shah?