SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (462261)9/20/2003 11:10:55 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
John Mc Cain is a Rep. and is highly respected by me.



To: American Spirit who wrote (462261)9/20/2003 11:13:02 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 769667
 
businessweek.com:/print/magazine/content/03_26/b3839605.htm?mz
A Real Recovery Is Coming Into View
Economists we surveyed were nearly unanimous. Count on a bounce


You've heard this forecast before: The economy will pick up in the second half. That's what economists were saying -- wrongly -- this time last year. Now, they're peddling the same line for 2003. Should we believe them this time?

You bet. The combination of positive supports for stronger growth is the most powerful since the boom turned to bust three years ago. Everything from stimulative policy to friendlier financial conditions to waning geopolitical uncertainty is falling into place. These factors will serve as fuel to keep consumers spending, plus they'll provide the higher octane needed to rev up capital spending on new equipment and facilities. That has been the missing link between this wannabe recovery and the real thing.

THE SIGNS POINT UP
"Absent further shocks, there is every reason now to expect confidence and activity to rise sharply," says Ian Shepherdson at High Frequency Economics. That's the general view of the 30 economists polled by BusinessWeek in its midyear outlook survey. All but one forecaster expect growth in the second half to be stronger than in the first. The only real disagreement is over how much stronger. On average, they foresee 3.5% growth in the second half, picking up to 3.75% in the first half of 2004. However, 19 of the forecasters see at least one quarter of 4% growth or higher in the coming year, and several think their projections are more likely to be too low than too high.

Economists also admit to being off the mark last year. Joseph Liro at Stone & McCarthy Research Associates acknowledges his overly optimistic forecast for 2002 with a ready "mea culpa." But forecasters can be forgiven for missing the shocks that occurred. The fact is, the recovery was starting to pick up steam early in 2002, after the tragedy of September 11. Then last spring, corporate scandals sent the markets and business confidence skidding. Autumn brought yet another jolt, as the Bush Administration began to beat war drums. That drew down a darker veil of uncertainty, further depressing the stock market and business sentiment. "The economy has been suffering from chronic shock fatigue," says Michael Carey at Crédit Lyonnais.

Now both consumers and businesses seem poised to kick it up a notch, especially with both the Federal Reserve and Capitol Hill ready to help out. "There's enough stimulus from monetary and fiscal policy to make a strong recovery likely," says Henry Willmore at Barclays Capital (BCS ) The economic bang from the Bush tax plan promises to add somewhere between 0.5 and 1.5 percentage points to growth in the coming year, say the economists. Adds Donald Straszheim at Straszheim Global Advisors: "The most important aspect by far of the tax bill is the cut to 15% on dividends, which greatly raises the attractiveness of those assets." That, plus the cut in the rate on capital gains to 15%, will add an estimated $23 billion to the economy over the next year and a half, on top of the $120 billion in tax breaks for wage earners and the nearly $50 billion in incentives for businesses.

Even absent the tax cut, most economists were expecting a second-half rebound. Overall financial conditions, including interest rates, stock prices, and the dollar, are more accommodative to growth than at any time in three years. Stock prices have rallied, and the economists, on average, expect the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index to rise about 7%, to 1,070 by June 30, 2004. The dollar is down from its restrictively high levels, especially against the euro. Banks' lending standards are less stringent. And in the credit markets, the spread between corporate and Treasury bonds has narrowed sharply, a clear sign that the markets are assigning a lower level of risk to investment activity.

These financial boosts should extend into 2004. Because the Fed will remain on guard against deflation, forecasters expect policymakers to keep short-term rates low well into next year, even as the economy perks up. That means long rates will also stay exceptionally low -- a boon for housing, mortgage refinancing, and the repair of household and corporate balance sheets.

Moreover, both households and businesses will eventually benefit from lower oil prices. The price of oil is down from its peak of $38 per barrel just before the Iraq war, but it remains close to $30, in part because of the delays in getting Iraqi oil flowing again, even as natural gas prices remain high. Still, most economists expect oil to be cheaper a year from now. The rule of thumb is that lower oil prices add about 0.5 percentage points to growth for every $10-per-barrel decline.

DEMAND LIES WAITING
Most important of all, healthier financial conditions and a potent policy mix boost the outlook for capital spending, the key to a strong and sustained recovery. Corporate outlays for tech equipment are on the rise, and the trend in capital-goods orders is turning up. Gene Huang at FedEx (FDX ) notes that the two-year slide in business construction is bottoming out. "Hopefully, this is an indication that the adjustment phase in capital spending is approaching an end," he says, "if it hasn't already ended."

Not only are external financial conditions the brightest in three years, but internal sources of funds, boosted by rising profits and depreciation and lower interest costs, have improved. The cash flow of nonfinancial corporations has swollen to levels far above those seen during the late 1990s boom. In the first quarter, cash flow was sufficient to cover 90% of all capital spending, the highest such coverage in a decade.

At some point, businesses must satisfy their growing pent-up demand for equipment. "Much of the equipment we have in our factories and workplaces is just plain wearing out," says Diane Swonk at Bank One (ONE ). "Indeed, evidence suggests we have now underinvested after overshooting the mark in the late 1990s." The data bear her out. For the past five quarters, capital spending by nonfinancial corporations has lagged behind depreciation. That means the stock of productive assets in the economy is shrinking, something that has never happened in the post-World War II era.

If so, the coming rebound is hardly the stuff that deflation is made of, and, in fact, none of the economists think deflation is a serious threat. Kurt Karl at Swiss Re ticks off four reasons: The Fed is prepared to take strong action, service-sector inflation is currently near 3%, the dollar's decline is lifting prices of imports and the goods that compete with them, and stronger growth will make deflation a moot point. Robert Shrouds at DuPont (DD ) is more direct: "Face it. Greenspan has won. This is price stability. What's the problem?"

POSSIBLE POTHOLES
That may be true, but a couple of nagging problems remain. One is the labor markets. Cost-conscious companies, intent on boosting productivity and profits, will keep hiring in check. Another issue is weak growth abroad. "Help from the G-8 countries is needed, says Allen Sinai at Decision Economics, "particularly through easier monetary policy in the euro zone, Britain, and eventually in Canada." However, much-needed structural reforms in Japan, Germany, and the rest of the euro zone are equally crucial to getting global growth back on track.

Of course, just as accounting scandals and war derailed last year's forecast, another shock could make this midyear forecast feel like déjà vu all over again. But absent a new jolt, the forecasters make a strong argument that the conditions for the long-awaited rebound are now firmly in place.



To: American Spirit who wrote (462261)9/20/2003 11:23:32 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 769667
 
From the Fed, Bland News Is Good News
Greenspan & Co., didn't ruffle any feathers with the Sept. 16 statement, reassuring investors that rates won't rise for a "considerable period"
Less apparently was more for Alan Greenspan & Co. this time around. At the Sept. 16 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, the Federal Reserve's policy-setting arm, the central bank kept interest rates in check, maintaining the Fed funds rate at a decades-low 1%. The Fed said little that was new in the policy statement that followed the meeting. And that apparently was just fine with the financial markets. Extending earlier gains, the Dow Jones industrial average closed up 119 points, or 1.25%, at 9567. The Nasdaq's rally was even stronger, rising 42 points, or 2.25%, to 1,887.

The Fed stood pat on rates even as the economy appears poised for the strongest sustained growth since the recession ended. Indeed, the central bank forged ahead with its cumbersome dual-policy statement -- which evenly split the outlook for economic growth and price stability -- a signal that it won't be ready to remove its accommodative policy stance "for a considerable time."

PINK-SLIP BLUES. The FOMC opted to keep the new policy statement nearly identical with its Aug. 12 predecessor. Indeed, the statement issued after the Sept. 16 meeting repeated by rote the roles of accommodative monetary policy and robust productivity in providing a solid foundation for the economy.

Contrary to the forecast by some Fed-watchers that the central bank would ratchet up its expectations for growth, however, Greenspan & Co. indicated that the labor market remained the economy's Achilles' heel. "The evidence accumulated over the intermeeting period confirms that spending is firming, although the labor market has been weakening," the second paragraph of the statement said.

That's somewhat of a contrast to the Aug. 12 statement, when the FOMC said labor-market indicators were "mixed." The semantic shift appeared to accommodate the unexpectedly high 93,000 drop in nonfarm payrolls in August -- and the recent run of weekly initial-jobless claims averaging well above the 400,000 level, which suggest job-market conditions remain weak.

MARKET REACTIONS. Significantly, the Fed otherwise stood by its balanced assessment of the economic risks going forward, while sustaining its view that "the probability, though minor, of an unwelcome fall in inflation exceeds that of a rise in inflation from its already low level." The Fed reiterated that the "risk of inflation becoming undesirably low remains the predominant concern for the foreseeable future." Underscoring that point, it repeated its intention to maintain an easy policy stance for a "considerable period."

The bond market's reaction to this tellingly repressed statement was understandably bland -- which makes it a resounding success by recent Fed standards. Fed fund futures, a trading vehicle for market pros to bet on the future direction of interest rates, indicated virtually no chance that the Fed will hike before February, 2004. In fact, it isn't until July, 2004, that the futures market fully reflects the risk of a quarter-point rate hike, to 1.25%. The comparable euro-dollar contract pegs the benchmark rate at 1.5% by then.

Treasury prices initially moved a bit higher in reaction to the statement, especially after the upgrade to the Fed's growth outlook conjured by some market observers failed to take place. But the stock market brushed aside the FOMC's rhetorical subtleties and extended earlier gains. The strength in equities helped push bonds back to unchanged levels by the close, but sustained the impulse toward a steeper yield curve -- the spread between rates on the 2-year note and 10-year bond. The dollar initially weakened, but finished higher vs. the euro and yen.

EYES ON '04. We at MMS International expect that the Fed's accommodative position will be increasingly difficult to maintain heading into 2004 amid an improving economy, though its vigilance on deflation can probably be maintained at least through the end of this year. With growth set to surge above a 6% annual rate in the last half of 2003 -- and to average 4.5% in 2004 -- we expect the Fed to begin to take back some of its historic string of rate cuts by the middle of next year.

The key is just how quickly the markets move from pricing in this risk to getting ahead of the policy curve. Another move higher in Treasury yields late in the year could either be a vote on Fed credibility or the improving economy. The bottom line for the Fed: It would be wise to keep policy options open for the "foreseeable future." And the Fed's track record on staying flexible seems pretty solid.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wallace is a senior market strategist for MMS International


businessweek.com:/print/investor/content/sep2003/pi20030917_3630_pi031.htm?pi



To: American Spirit who wrote (462261)9/21/2003 1:17:34 AM
From: cnyndwllr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Spirit, a little insight into medals. It's about the medal and the rank of the person that received it. In addition, it's about the action and how badly the military wanted to paint the action with heroic color. Here are some keys:

* Generally speaking, the higher the rank, the less valor required to receive any given medal. All medals require that an officer make a recommendation. Sometimes one officer will do a quid pro quo deal with another and they will write each other up. Sometimes officers are given medals, including Silver Star medals, for action of their units that did not involve much physical risk on their parts. I believe that some Generals have even been awarded the medal of honor for what I would consider the valor of their units. If you ever see an enlisted man with a Silver Star, you know he did a very brave thing. I personally know of one officer in Vietnam who was an abject coward and he was one of three men in my company who were awarded Silver Stars.

* When the military wants to hype an action and deflect attention from a possibly bad result, I believe the military issues more medals to highlight the courage of the soldiers and discourage criticism. I think that if you look at the number of medals and types of medals awarded when we have significant casualties, you'll find a good connection.

* Bronze Stars are not all for valor. I believe some are awarded for meritorious service. I'm not sure Davis was awarded a Bronze Star for valor and, remember, he was an officer.

* The awards that are valued by those who've been there, are the Combat Infantryman's Badge for Army soldiers and the Purple Heart. It's difficult to fake the circumstances that merit the issuance of these awards. You must have been in actual combat for both. I have heard of generals who've flown over a firefight and been awarded a CIB, but that's rare.

Having said all of that, from what I know of Clark's award, (directing his unit while seriously wounded,) he was brave and even if he'd been a non-officer he'd have likely received some award, but maybe not the Silver Star. I don't know much about the circumstances of Kerry's awards but he was there and he kept on going back even after three wounds. He was clearly a warrior. Both of them have earned my thanks and respect for their service. But not Davis, at least not for his "valor." Of course all of them are heads and shoulders above the posers like Bush who seem to think that bravery means not being afraid to send someone else to fight. "Bring em on????"



To: American Spirit who wrote (462261)9/21/2003 10:30:49 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Yes maggots throw medals back in America's face, And medals also don't make heroes. In any case identifying stupidity and idiot analysis is not bashing. In the case of spookie it's exposing a mind rotting in hate and all the stupidity and stink it oozes.