Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (4960)	9/22/2003 9:00:14 AM
From: Done, gone.	Respond to of 5315

My interpretation of your posts and, it is my interpretation, is that you wish to be some sort of apologist or defender of these boards, around which a significant portion of your life revolves. You seem to enjoy your own posts and write for your own pleasure. You feel you have all the answers and want to eliminate others with whom you may disagree. You feel their disagreement is some sort of attack on SI and expresses an intent to destroy SI. You do not leave yourself open to the thought that you may be wrong and that the critic often times creates improvement. Bingo. Only one solution to the problem, IMHO: siliconinvestor.com Helps a lot. Still results in one having to wade through all the response posts here by those who have yet to employ the solution, but nothing's perfect.

To: rrufff who wrote (4960)	9/23/2003 2:46:44 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Dear rrufff, Let me echo your post to me to help me understand that the contents of my posts are adulterated with my own self serving attempts to obtain a tainted realization of reality, using distortions of the facts to influence others. - [start.] Dear rruff, I really hate to be blunt, however, you go on and on. You realize that you can not respond with answers or an examination of the facts that I present to you. To do so will prevent the "end" you are seeking using the false "means" you are pursuing it with. Its clear to anyone reading your posts that a conclusion was reached in responce to your initial inquire asking for a second look at the event(s) leading to your suspension from investorshub, and from that decision it was determined that your suspension was legal and valid per the TOU conditions that you agreed to accept by your posting activity. So there you were, not wanting that outcome, and what did you do is now written over and over in your posts that deny to all that what happened, happened. Sad, but it the landscape Si & iHub must accept when they accept membership from the general populace without first obtaining a background check of one's mental ability to use reason. But really, its not all that bad, not really since there are some people here like myself needing to learn the correct and proper manner to think, not using a Thinking 101 book, but really the opposite approach by learning how not to think. Surely many books are written on mental illness, but its a quirk of nature that some things cannot be learned from book reading & studing, but needs an actual experience to have happen to the person, or in that very rare case that includes a Good/Bad News item, the ability like me to enter inside the mental condition of another person, be them sane or insane or troubled or different from anything knowned about. One has to be able to enter, and while that is extremely a rare condition to exhibit, the ability to them wander another's mind is a skill very hard to master, but then the Bad News arrives in that the ability to then leave that other mind and return to your own mind is a double hoop to jump through, as 99% that actually reach that point, the first hoop into a back into your own mind from another, are unable to make a clean transition, but carry with them remnants of the other's mind content intermixed with their own having no clear attachments to know what to cut away. These people end up going insane as they struggle to move away mentally from foreign thoughts that have become their own thought. (aka) One cannot escape oneself. But they live that life as being another with themself. Me, its a piece of cake. - So here we have rruff's attempt to make undone that which he says has never been done. "... a response from the Owner and/or a clarification as to how TOU is to be enforced." D:oug

To: rrufff who wrote (4960)	9/23/2003 1:18:47 PM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

rrufff, don't worry, it's not just you: "As I posted before, perhaps it's me, I find your posts really are not comprehensible. Again, maybe it's me. I am not going to say what my IQ is but let's say I've rarely had problems with comprehension in the past." I actually had to stop reading AKdoug's posts because I found them lacking in interest or value of any sort. I think he is happy if he can just be boring enough that people decide not to read the thread anymore. He runs around SI and ihub defusing criticism of the censorship that occurs by jumping into the fray and boring any interested party to tears. It's like he is very pleased that the hypesters and promoters are able to lobby Matt and get the most credible detractors silenced (in my case for simply stating the facts about the earliest and most prolific IDCC promoter). Ihub is a stock promoters wet dream and is not a credible place for serious stock discussion. Bux AKA Onceinalifetime