SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (75299)9/22/2003 3:08:07 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 82486
 
"Gosh, that's a good point. Wish I had thought of it."

gggggggarsh, since neither one of you has a clue maybe that would have been good.

I know you wont answer because you long ago went on a straw man campaign. But I would be so honored if you would show me where THIS

"Thus, his true obligation, if the protection of women is really his major concern...

is the focus of mojo's perspective. I have asked you previously, but you have prefered to have these little hate parties with chris...

This is a deliberate obfuscasion. I find it disgusting karen and beneath your typical comportment.



To: Lane3 who wrote (75299)9/22/2003 3:11:21 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
Jewel, of course, thinks it has no relevance to Mojo's situation.

You, of course, realize differently.

Jewel refuses to respond to the point since I raised it.

Maybe he would respond to it if you or Neo raised it.

Or maybe not.

The fact is that Mojo isn't really concerned, at least not immediately, with his clients. He's concerned with protecting his own personal purity as he sees it. But that isn't an acceptable basis for discriminating, so he's had to go about trying to find a defense that will work.

That's what a good defense attorney does for a living. But I'm a better prosecutor than Jewel is defense attorney, which is why I can see through all the attempted evasions of reality he tries to toss out as justifications for Mojo's position.



To: Lane3 who wrote (75299)9/22/2003 5:08:46 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I didn't think mojo's goal was the protection of women- I thought his goal was preventing sexual arousal in anyone.