SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (8992)9/23/2003 9:49:14 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793696
 
dupe



To: JohnM who wrote (8992)9/23/2003 9:49:14 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793696
 
John,
Maybe chalabi is right and the cynical french plan is better than the bremer semi-quagmire?? plan? It really is much about stuff we laymen(and most experts) have no idea about. I heard condi rice say iraqis need elections and a constitution before power could be turned over. There was great hesitance to turn it over to the current interim govt. Yet this interim govt has gotten the blessing of the arab league and wto, i believe. Why the hesitance? A cynical interpetation is that perhaps we are giving chalabi et al "sea legs" by allowing them to position themselves as independent of the US. And who says elections and constitution has to be in place before self rule anyway? Didn't our constitution come after we were running our own affairs? And havent there been many examples of countries being led by folks with elections to follow? And sometimes those elections and constitutions actually occur, you know. Rambling in the morning. mike

PS And perhaps if the chalabi version of the french plan is adopted, wont france and germany be forced to help out?



To: JohnM who wrote (8992)9/23/2003 12:50:43 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793696
 
I'll still see Brooks struggling to find a voice that he considers appropriate for his writing style, his sense of self, his political convictions and his new position as an op ed columnist for the Times.

I see Brooks on course to develop a voice that will appeal to the largly Liberal readers of the Times. The days of the type of influence of a Lippman or Reston are over. The market is just too fragmented. But I believe he is going to be "The" Op-Ed writer for them. TWT.