Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (75595)	9/26/2003 9:06:49 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

"982 to go for the freaked out hypocrite, solon. To bad the sexuality and beliefs of others is so disturbing to you" I'm not interested in your sexuality, Jewels. I've asked you NOTHING about your sexuality. I asked you: WHO was at risk? and WHO were they at risk FROM? These questions were pertinent to the discussion you initiated about "a therapist" who would exclude particular clients because he believed that to be his clients would place them at some form of risk from someone in his office. I remember also discussing honesty and truth with you a short time back; and I remember how you gushed over the value of honesty and how honest were the special colours you claimed to model as you strutted your morality about town. Hmmm...but now you are not even able to respond with honesty to a couple of simple questions when you are put to the test! And because I ask these questions, I am a "freaked out hypocrite"!! You are quite the man aren't you, Jewels?! Quite the specimen, indeed! <gg> Is there any possibility you can drop the hateful potty-mouth responses and simply answer the questions like an honest man?! Is your religion so trivial to you that you allow your feelings of hate and inferiority to take precedence over honesty and decency? Look at your responses and see what others see, Jewels. You will be ashamed, Jewels. You truly will.