Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (75600)	9/26/2003 9:44:59 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I have been deliberately avoiding reading these posts between you and Jewels, but I gather from the gist the argument is about the wrongness of members of the opposite sex giving massages to one another...? Having had two back surgeries, I've had call to make the rounds seeking various forms of relief. (Not recently, thankfully) The best therapy was massage therapy, and I've visited quite a few, all of them were women. They were all very knowledgeable and professional. There is a two year degree in it. They study anatomy and know muscle structure. It's demeaning to them to imply hanky panky may occur just because they are working on men....

To: Solon who wrote (75600)	9/26/2003 3:23:52 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

981 to go... " I remember also discussing honesty and truth with you a short time back..." You don't qualify.

To: Solon who wrote (75600)	9/26/2003 4:31:27 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

What part of my original answer did you not get. I understand that YOU WANT me to identify somebody as bad. The scenario did not call for that. You and yours want to define mojo as a culprit. You were not able to do that and so now you want me to do it for you. It simply isn't the case. My answer: ”The circumstance has been defined as high risk. That has been made abundantly clear to you. mojo has identified no particular culprit. You have attempted to accuse him of that more than once, as have karen and chris but the accusation has not stuck (all based on your unwarranted "assumptions") Can you claim that the circumstance isn't endowed with higher than normal incidents of harmful behavior? Can you support that claim? Can you do other than karen who simply moaned about the posting of evidence? “ What do you want mojo to do?