Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (3045)	9/26/2003 7:36:41 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Well "all Europe" was not in ruins yet. Not in 1941. That was the period of time when things were relatively quiet in Europe. The German's occupied all Europe and had been pounding England. America was not in the war yet and there was no allied bombing at that point. That all came later, after America entered the war. I do think that site does not have a solid grasp of all the reasons FDR wanted a war. It would help the economy but there were other reasons. history1900s.about.com You mean to tell me that you think that governments never lie to the people they govern. That certainly is very enlightened, or is it gullible? I think gullible. And you think I'm being taken in by conspiracy theories while you claim all governments are honest. That's the most laughable theory yet!!

To: AK2004 who wrote (3045)	9/26/2003 8:04:44 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Here's another reason FDR wanted the war. The war helped show the need for a world governing body that could stop wars. Not that the UN ever has stopped any wars. Jan 1, 1942 - Declaration of the United Nations signed by 26 Allied nations. The globalist's were hard at work back then too.

To: AK2004 who wrote (3045)	9/28/2003 11:34:45 AM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Typical re-direction in an argument away from Albert's ridiculous statement of with all Europe in ruins referring to 1941 I get lambasted about what the physical boundaries of Europe are. That to include a few cities that had been bombed. But albert said "all Europe" in his ridiculous statement. None of you right wing megalomaniacs pointed out the ridiculousness of albert's statement. Just attack me when I rightly (and with proof) point out that "all Europe" was not in ruins in 1941. And I went on to add that Germany was not touched at that time and the allied bombing had not even started yet. Then you proceed with the geography lesson ignoring the correctness of everything else I said. Albert's statement was ridiculous regardless of your political allegiance to him on these threads.