SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (76090)10/1/2003 7:34:21 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Are you basicaly arguing that Mojo has an explicit or implied contract if he sets an appointment with someone or even puts up a sign advertising his services and saying "just walk in no appointment needed"?

I might agree in the first case, probably not a contract that would be legally enforceable or that even should be enforced but atleast a commitment where by failing to live up to the commitment could reasonably be considered causing harm. I'm not so sure about the second.

Also what if Mojo sets up appointments explicitly to discuss if someone should be his client rather then for the performance of services? Or what if Mojo only performs services for people he knows well?

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (76090)10/1/2003 8:10:38 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I think it's more than that.

Simple question.

If a housing development enforces a "no blacks or jews" policy, and there are other places they can buy houses so they aren't done out of the right to buy housing, are they harmed?

If so, how?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News