Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (10314)	10/2/2003 2:41:29 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793690

I think it was an innocent mistake to release her name. Two things I find interesting. First, I think Dana Priest's story about 6 reporters being called sounds like a separate event from Novak's story. He is such a snake that you can't trust him, but I know how aggressive he is. I suspect he did get this story on his own. This means that after he got his interviews, the people in the shop knew it was out, and either one of them called the other reporters, or perhaps that part of the story is wrong. But I think what still fascinates both of us is the identity and motive of this weeks leaker. Doesn't add up yet. Not with Bush's shop, and their passion for "no leaks." lindybill@leakingleakersandtheleakerswholeakthem.com