Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (76346)	10/3/2003 12:01:08 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

It is a bit like Dodge-Ball. The last person who doessn't get hit by the random throw of the ball wins. Look at the convolutions! Look at the reversals of rulings and the consequences which attach! I understand that policy and procedure were followed to the final conclusion. I am not saying it was not properly conducted. I am merely musing on the inanity of "justice" where a person or a bias or the sun coming through the window, or the judge's bottle of scotch can make all the difference. What about when people do not have the resources or the inclination or the energy to go to higher courts and eventually the Supremes? It is random in the sense that it depends on a myriad of factors which are not standardized but are based on resources of money and connections. courts.wa.gov