Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (116252)	10/5/2003 4:51:09 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You think she said there was definitely a connection? How is anybody supposed to argue with this? How would Albright know in the first place? Foxnews.com and news.google.com turned up nothing related, one might think that other true believers would have picked up and propagated such a juicy tidbit.

To: KLP who wrote (116252)	10/6/2003 7:49:01 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Many people have many connections in many directions (think of the 6-degrees of separation). The issue is not if Saddam had a connection to AQ or would have wanted to see US burn to the ground. The relevant questions are (a) how much of a threat Saddam's support was and (b) did we counter it in the best way possible. The United States has supported many terrorist groups...errr...freedom fighters...against other governments. Do you then find it justifiable for those countries to bomb US because we provided refuge to their opposition?