To: Maurice Winn who wrote (131292 ) 10/6/2003 9:43:41 AM From: Jim Mullens Respond to of 152472 Mq, Re Telecom New Zealand and “Peter Griffin got the number of CDMA subscribers wrong [they wrote 60 million instead of 160 million].” “PETER GRIFFIN telecoms writer” got a number of other items wrong also. Snips>>> 1. “.... (CDMA) A lack of seamless global roaming is its biggest downfall. “ To his credit he did, later in his article, include a statement from a Telecom official that a CDMA phone that could also roam on GSM networks was in the works. But he downplayed that with this technically correct but misleading statement – “But such handsets are expensive to produce and are still up to a year away from being marketed. “ We have been told that Qualcomm MSM6300 equipped handset will be on the market before 2003 ye. 2. “Both W-CDMA and Telecom's logical upgrade path CDMA EV-DO boast access speeds up to 384 kilobits per second (Kbps), faster than many broadband packages now available. “ I believe the spec reads up to 2.4Mbps . Brian Modoff (DB) in his recent EV-DO Verizon tests in San Diego stated- “we recorded average data rates that were typically in the 500- 800 kbps range while observing peak rates that reached 1.2Mbps” 3. “CDMA1xRTT - Telecom's latest evolution, provides data transfer speeds averaging 60 kilobits per second (Kbps) to 80Kbps, twice as fast as dial-up internet.” That’s true, but why then did he offer a misleading comparison to GPRS using “data speeds up to” in the following statement? “GPRS - general packet radio service, with data speeds up to 114Kbps. The next step up from GSM. Popular among business mobile and Vodafone Live! users. “ Mq, is “PETER GRIFFIN ( telecoms writer)” knowledgeable in this area and distorting the facts in favor of the GSMA view , or is he just another "clueless journalist"?