Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (76583)	10/6/2003 1:31:56 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

This is a very different question and one that I think, I have addressed from the time I provided mojo’s belief statement until now. I meant it as the same question. The first had some extra language in it that may have been distracting. You can answer, instead, the second one if you like. Groups of people are not excluded they are served in the most appropriate setting. You just gave me an idea for another alternative. Maybe Mojo and Myrna could open an office together. The receptionist would assign clients to the two therapists based on Mojo's criteria and the clients would never know that they were rejected by Mojo's criteria. That's much less potentially hurtful than handing them Myrna's card. Of course, he'd have to pray that Myrna never took a sick day... I honestly believe that I could go to 100 women Did you not see the the data I found from the State of Georgia saying that complaints against massage therapists are rare? Re your survey, I've actually asked at least a dozen women, friends and women I know slightly from the pool. Two of the women from the pool are therapists, as it turns out. Not one woman reported a sexually-charged experience.

To: one_less who wrote (76583)	10/6/2003 1:49:05 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 82486

I have declared, on several occasions that mojo considers every type equal in their abilities, that he harbors no ill will toward any types What you don't seem to get is that denials and declarations are not answers to questions. If I declared that Auntie was only acting in the best interests of her niece, the bride, would you accept that as a response? Would you say "oh, well, of course, why didn't I think of that?" An answer to questions and challenges posed analyzes the positions of both sides and devises an explanation that addresses the concerns. Denials and declarations are useless in problem solving.