To: reaper who wrote (84185 ) 10/16/2003 9:59:48 AM From: Perspective Respond to of 209892 Interesting that MGIC is tilting *toward* bulk loans, when they obviously have a much higher problem rate: New insurance written in the third quarter was $28.0 billion, compared to $21.9 billion in the third quarter of 2002.New insurance written for the quarter included $7.3 billion of bulk business compared with $4.4 billion in the same period last year. New insurance written in the first nine months of 2003 was $77.5 billion compared to $67.3 billion for the same period last year and includes $20.6 billion of bulk business compared to $16.7 billion in the same period last year. As of September 30, 2003, MGIC's primary insurance in force was $191.0 billion, compared with $197.0 billion at December 31, 2002, and $196.6 billion at September 30, 2002. The book value of MGIC Investment Corporation's investment portfolio was $5.1 billion at September 30, 2003, compared with $4.7 billion at December 31, 2002, and $4.6 billion at September 30, 2002.At September 30, 2003, the percentage of loans that were delinquent, excluding bulk loans, was 3.67 percent, compared with 3.19 percent at December 31, 2002, and 2.85 percent at September 30, 2002. Including bulk loans, the percentage of loans that were delinquent at September 30, 2003 was 5.41 percent, compared to 4.45 percent at December 31, 2002, and 4.04 percent at September 30, 2002. Losses incurred in the third quarter were $220.7 million, up from $101.1 million reported for the same period last year due to increases in the delinquency inventory and paid losses. Underwriting expenses were $77.7 million in the third quarter up from $66.8 million reported for the same period last year due to increases in underwriting volumes. Bright boys, these ones.<s> BC