Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sullie6 who wrote (12)	10/16/2003 2:19:50 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35834

From clueless in Silicon Valley........ "The republicans used to blame the stock market bubble for the carnage in the high tech industry, the problem with that is that here we are 3 years later and a bunch of the bubble stocks are back to their old highs with more revenues than they had in 2000. So the "bubble bursting" excuse doesn't really work." <reply from Nadine Carroll> A handful of bubble survivors, maybe. The rest are penny stocks, or dead entirely. Go look for any class that soared in the bubble - ecommerce? web engines? internet consulting companies? telecom? and then go tell me if they are all back to their highs, those you can still find. As for the big hi-techs, the very best of them are trading now for half or less what they traded for then. Microsoft traded at a split-adjusted 60. Today it's 29. Sun traded at 60. Today it's 3. Cisco traded at 80. Today it's 21. Dell traded at 58. Today it's 36. And these are the best companies, the ones who not only survived but outperformed (well maybe not Sun). Look at the market: The Nasdaq topped out over 5000 in March 2000. Today it's 1950. No, we didn't just have a "bubble". We had a full-bore, devil-take-the-hindmost mania. Tulip city. The workout after such a mania is not quick, and frankly I'm amazed that it hasn't been even worse than it has been. I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop. There's very little a sitting President can do about a stock market boom and bust and its effects on the economy, one way or the other. The Fed Chairman has more influence, but it's still limited. Message 19407731 Clueless is unfazed & says....... "yes that is the Bush supporter's angle. I see it differently, I think this economy would be on fire right now if it weren't for all this offshoring of jobs. It is fear, pessimism and relentless war mongering that has allowed that fear to become pervasive in the US...... I don't think Bush should have asked for that money to rebuild iraq's infrastructure. Seems like a very bad political call to me." Lizzie Tudor Message 19407749