Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (77641)	10/16/2003 8:35:20 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Sexualized inappropriately has already be defined as something that violates mojo’s conscience." But arousal doesn't violate the conscience of the client. Thus it is not inappropriate to normal people. Therefore, we leave aside the irrelevant. The question was as to the damage caused--not the reason for the damage...but the damage itself. The client was the one aroused by (his own business). The client says it was not inappropriate. Moho cannot blame the client. So how is Moho harmed? Is it physical damage, emotional damage? WHAT? Why is this so hard for you?! :-) You said he was harmed many times. Do you want me to bring up the posts? CHUCKLE!! ;-)