Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (77646)	10/16/2003 8:45:54 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

"But arousal doesn't violate the conscience of the client. Thus it is not inappropriate to normal people. Therefore, we leave aside the irrelevant." It is your assumption that it is normal for people to be comfortable with being sexualized on a massage therapists table. That is not born out by the tone or the letter of the massage therapist ethical standards. It is your assumption that it would not violate anyone but mojo's conscience to become sexually aroused by a massage therapist. You have not validated that as fact. It is a fact that some people would feel compromised in that type of situation. If you believe them to be outside the norm, then we may disagree on that. Whether they are in the norm or more conservative than the norm is inconsequential. It is a fact that mojo is conservative and provides a service to conservative people who find being sexualized on a massage therapists table unwelcome, uncomfortable, a violation of their personal ethics, and something to be avoided when they have an option. Mojo provides them that option, and is hurting no one in the process. For some reason that offends you ...