Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (176838)	10/21/2003 8:47:23 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576160

And isn't that what I said. HELL no. It isn't ANYTHING like what you said. You said, "the courts do not make new law". Let's not change the subject to avoid admitting you're wrong, okay?

To: tejek who wrote (176838)	10/21/2003 9:08:28 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576160

The Miranda act was redefining and expanding the meaning of the EXISTING 5th amendment. It was not creating new law but rather expanding existing law. The Miranda Act was passed by Congress YEARS after the Miranda decision created the law that required the Miranda warning. "For example, when the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda warnings were required, it became the law across the United States, even though no legislature passed the law or codified it." Everyone on this thread has had to admit they were wrong about something in the past. Except for YOU. If you can make yourself do it this one time, I think it will be much easier for you in the future when you are obviously maintaining an idiotic position and are called on it.