SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 4:07:23 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793897
 
Bush-Hating

I posted it to John yesterday, hoping he will read it when he gets back. Deconstructs Krugman very well. I have been following the "Gods and Generals" story and told a friend the only Religion you can publicly criticize is Christianity. Amazing how the Liberals have got it to that point.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 4:40:35 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793897
 
ADL Letter to the New York Times
____________________________________

Letters to the Editor
The New York Times October 21, 2003

To the Editor:



In his obsession with criticizing U.S. policy, Paul Krugman underestimates the significance of the anti-Semitic diatribe by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad before the Organization of the Islamic Conference ("Listening to Mahathir," Oct. 21).



Mahathir's comments cannot be explained away by themes of domestic politics. They come in the context of a surge of anti-Semitism in the Islamic world, and not only on the fringes. Conspiracy theories about blaming Jews for 9/11 are believed by tens of millions. Denial of the Holocaust is rampant in the media. Images of Jews in op-ed pieces, editorials, and cartoons reflect classic anti-Semitic stereotypes – drinking the blood of Muslims, all-powerful, secretive and conspiratorial.



The last time the world saw such a hateful anti-Semitic tirade by a national leader, there was a tendency to play it down as well – as only politics, as buffoonery, as a passing thing. We know how that ended up in Germany. Let's not make that mistake again.

Sincerely,

Glen A. Tobias
National Chairman
ADL
adl.org



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 4:44:37 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793897
 
The hatred comes right with the immigrants to Sweden
_____________________________________________________

Silence surrounds Muslim Jew-hatred

Sverker Oredsson and Mikael Tossavainen
Translation by Mårten Barck
Swedish original: "Judehat bland muslimer tystas ned"
(Dagens Nyheter, 2003/10/20)

A Muslim and Arab Jew-hatred is spreading in the suburbs of the major Swedish towns. At the same time Jewish congregations in Sweden are reporting a sharp increase in Muslim aggression towards Jews in recent years. This is shown in a new report presented in DN Debatt.

NEW REPORT: ARAB AND MUSLIM ATTACKS ON JEWS ARE RISING SHARPLY IN SWEDISH SOCIETY.

"Silence surrounds Muslim Jew-hatred"

Teachers in the suburbs of the major Swedish towns report widespread and brazen hostility against Jews among groups of Arab and Muslim students. These students view the Holocaust as Zionistic propaganda, express admiration for Hitler and regret that he didn't succeed in killing more Jews. The problem is aggravated by the almost complete silence which is surrounding this form of jew-hatred. Sverker Oredsson, a professor of History, and the researcher Mikael Tossavainen write on a new report about the subject which is presented today.

Most Swedes believe that anti-Semitism is an extinct problem in our country. They are aware that prejudices and hatred aimed at Jews have regrettably occured in the past in Sweden but that is now seen as part of history. Most Swedes believe that our society has evolved and that we are more enlightened today. Most Swedes believe that Jews today don't meet more prejudices than Danes or smålänningar [people living in the Swedish province Småland].

Unfortunately they are wrong. During the last year the security police registered 131 anti-Semitic crimes. Nobody knows how many incidents go unreported but the security police expect the number to be large. Jews in Sweden today are living in the shadow of a very concrete anti-Semitism. Jews in Sweden today often feel compelled to hide their religious identity in public: necklaces with stars of David are carefully hidden under sweaters and orthodox Jewish men change their kippot to more discrete caps or hats when they are outdoors. Jews in Sweden nowadays get secret telephone numbers to avoid harassment. In Sweden. Today.

Anti-Semitism has been more or less absent from the political mainstream since the end of the Second World War. Jew-hatred was in principle only found among marginalized groups at the extreme right and left. That is not the case anymore.

During the last decade another form of anti-Semitism has started to spread in the suburbs of large Swedish towns: a Jew-hatred — often imported from the Middle East and not seldom presented under an Islamic flag — which also wins adherents among groups of Arabs and Muslims in Sweden.

In the Middle East anti-Semitism is alive and flourishing in a way which reminds one of Europe during the 1930s. Most regimes in the Arab world and in many other Muslim countries have supported the spread of Jew-hatred in state controlled media a long time.

In schools and mosques from the Atlantic to the Persian Gulf the message that Jews are descendants from monkeys and pigs, a treacherous and greedy people striving for global dominion, is preached. The Jews are blamed for practically everything. For example it is alleged that the 9/11 terror attacks were carried out by Jews in one form or another, most often the Mossad, with the aim of getting America to attack Islam. The explosive spread of AIDS in Africa and Asia in general, but in the Muslim world in particular, is blamed on the state of Israel, who is alleged to send out hiv-positive Jewish prostitutes to weaken the enemies of the Jews.

In addition the Holocaust is regularly described as a Jewish lie aimed at grabbing money from Germany or Swiss banks and give rise to sympathy for Israel and the Jewish people. Even ancient Christian blood libels about Jews using the blood of Christian children for the baking of "Purim" pastries are used in anti-Semitic propaganda. In Saudi Arabia, for example, the blood libel is spread in a modified version, where the blood is alleged to be from young Muslim boys.

This Jew-hatred is nourished partly by specific interpretations of Islam. Throughout history, Jews have traditionally been better treated in Muslim countries than in Christian ones and pious Muslims around the world have lived for centuries without letting their attitude towards Jews be charged with anti-Semitism. In spite of this there always has been some degree of discrimination and animosity. The Koran is not without passages which can be used for rationalizing jewhistolity. In connection with the colonisation of the Middle East, European Christian and racist anti-Semitism was also spread in the area. The serious attraction and exploitation of Jew-hatred was however connected to the antagonism between Jewish and Arab nationalism and later on the Arab-Israeli conflict.

The existence of a Jewish state in the middle of a perceived Muslim land and not least the current political situation in the Middle East heighten the anti-Jewish atmosphere in the Arab world and in other Muslim countries such as Iran and Pakistan. The Israeli state is the primary target for Arab and Muslim Jew-hatred, but the distinctions between Israelis, Zionists and Jews are not upheld. The propaganda which is spread from Damascus, Tehran and Islamabad often goes beyond criticism of Israeli politics and turns into pure demonization of the Jewish people.

This anti-Semitism is a part of the ideas and traditions brought to the segregated suburbs of Europe. The isolation from the new homeland and the retention of the culture of the country of origin via satellite TV, Internet etc., contribute to the survival and even strengthening of Jew-hatred among groups od Arabs and Muslims in London, Marseille and Paris.

But similar tendencies exist also in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmoe. This is shown in a study authored by one of the authors of this article, historian Mikael Tossavainen, which is published today by the Swedish committee against anti-Semitism.

Teachers in Swedish suburbs report widespread and brazen hostility against Jews among groups of Arab and Muslim students. This hostility is expressed by the refusal to concern oneself with anything that even can be considered as Jewish. Students may sabotage or skip teaching of Religion when Judaism is the subject, skip homework, books or examinations on courses about Judaism.

During lessons in history there are confrontations between teachers and students, who may on one hand claim that the Holocaust never happened — instead dismissing it as Zionistic propaganda — or on the other hand express their admiration of Hitler and regret that he didn't succeed in killing more Jews.

There are quite a few websites in Swedish on the Internet that cover Arab and Muslim political, cultural or religious topics. Many of these are spreading gross anti-Semitic propaganda together with information about Islam.

Jews are described as greedy, mean, power hungry, thieving, revengeful, blood thirsty and sexually perverse. The Jewish religion is also attacked and is described as an inferior, morally reprehensible doctrine.

To support these allegations, false quotes from the Bible and the Talmud are used in many cases. It is alleged, for example, that Jewish men have the religious right to rape non-Jewish women and that it is permitted for Jews to lie to or deceive non-Jews. These allegations are sometimes explained with the idea of the chosen people, which is distorted to some sort of Jewish superiority myth.

Another returning theme on these websites is the belief in the existence of a Jewish world-conspiracy. In connection with this delusion lists of well-known Swedes with Jewish origin who are alleged to be part of this conspiracy to obstruct Islam, enslave the Palestinian — alternatively the Arab — nation or simply take over the world, are sometimes published.

It is hardly surprising that people who are living in such a world of ideas and are constantly fed with this kind of portrayal of Jews become anti-Semites. Nor is it particularly surprising that these attitudes are channeled in the form of threats and violence against Jews.

Jewish congregations in Sweden have noted a sharp increase in harassment, threats and attacks by Arabs and Muslims against Jews in the Swedish society during the last few years, clearly connected to the escalation of the Middle East conflict.

In this connection it is important to emphasize that the Muslim minority in Sweden is a very heterogenous group, religiously, culturally as well as ideologically and that far from all Arabs and Muslims in Sweden have anti-Semitic views. The report is not exhaustive, but its results are unambiguous and they expose an alarming situation.

The problem is furthermore aggravated by the almost complete silence which is surrounding this form of Jew-hatred. If anti-Semitism among Arabs and Muslims in Sweden is discussed at all in Swedish media and debate, it tends to be in the form of trivializations or denials of the problem.

There are even examples of commentators who allege that anti-Semitism in Sweden today is a made-up problem, which is grotesquely exaggerated by the Jews to get the attention away from the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

The reason for the silence is probably multi-faceted. Perhaps some journalists and commentators regard their knowledge of Islam as insufficient for an appraisal of Islamic anti-Semitism. Perhaps they think it's difficult to draw a clear line between criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism. Perhaps they try to avoid criticizing a group which already is vulnerable and discriminated in the Swedish society out of a fear of adding to racism in general and islamophobia in particular.

You don't need any more profound knowledge about Islam, however, to be against anti-Semitism spread under the guise of religion: condemnation of Jew-hatred is not about criticism of Islam. You don't need any deeper knowledge about the Middle East conflict to realize that talk about a Jewish world-conspiracy or ritual murder of Muslim children cannot be considered legitimate criticism of the policies of Sharon's government. If this agitation against Jews had been spread by neo-Nazi groups it would in all probability be treated with great indignation and receive strong condemnations by the same journalists and politicians who turn a blind eye when it comes to Jew-hatred spread in the name of Islam.

Arab and Muslim immigrants are done a disservice by the silence surrounding anti-Semitic utterances: by not signalling that the Swedish society doesn't accept agitation against Jews, the integration of these groups is not speeded up nor made easier — to the contrary.

Nobody gains from indulgence or apologetic silence when facing anti-Semitism. In this respect it is completely irrelevant whether it is spread by members of organisations on the extreme left, neo-Nazis or Arabs and Muslims. It should never be acceptable for frustration over the situation in the Middle East to strike Swedish Jews. To turn a blind eye to the fact that it does is a silent approval and this can only have negative effects — not only for Jews in Sweden today, but in the long-term also for our open, tolerant society and for the Swedish democracy.

Intellectuals, politicians and leading representatives of Muslim organizations in Sweden must signal their repudiation of Arab and Muslim anti-Semitism in our country — for the benefit of all.

SVERKER OREDSSON
MIKAEL TOSSAVAINEN
watch.windsofchange.net



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 7:30:11 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793897
 
Some "on the spot" from "IsraPundit"
____________________________________

The changing Face of Israel

After a week long trip to Eilat I returned to Hadera and had some time for people and event watching. Every time I re-visit Israel, I discover subtle changes compared to previous years.

Although according to a poll more than 75% of the Israelis are content with life, there is growing discontent with the authorities and the government. The daily psychological strife with terrorism although for long being the Israeli way of life has been unabating and considerably more painful in the last 3 years.

The security issue is however largely overshadowed by the real or perceived economical difficulties. These are greatly overemphasized by the local media with it’s marked socialist slant which intensely covers every labor dispute from the labor unions’ perspective. Any threat of large scale lay-offs in public or private enterprises is a cause for major headlines. On paper there was a tiny 2% decrease in the GDP in the last year (compared to 30-40% decline in the Palestinian territories). Granted the unemployment rate is high at over 10% (compared to around 6-7% in the US but 7-10% in the EU), and rising. The once thriving high tech sector which was not long ago the pride of Israel’s economy took a hard beat as the NASDAQ plummeted. Tourism has also plummeted in wake of the current wave of violence to less than 50% from the record-high of 2000.

There is however hope. It seems that the GDP is poised to rebound with a 1.5-2% positive rate in 2004. Inflation has bottomed at 0-1% annually. Tourists which kept away due to security reasons have started to trickle back.

But perharps what strikes me the most is the changing face of the Israeli. More than 1 million Russians immigrated to Israel within less than a decade, now representing about 1 in 5 locals and making Israel’s population density comparable to India’s at around 230 people/ sq km (compare this to 35 people/ sq km in Europe, 29 in the US and only 6 in Canada). These Russians (Jews, Christians and mutts) haven’t relinquished their language which is now ubiquitous. Their culture is still separate from mainstream Israeli culture. Many shop in their own shops, drink their own wines, go to their own shows. The younger generation does however try to bridge the cultural divide and speaks both languages, serves in the army and in a way bring the Sabra and the Russians together. There was a large infusion of artists, musicians and engineers which have changed the social structure. Some found employment in their own occupation while most had to adapt to the new country finding new jobs in every walk of life (from government jobs to artists, shopkeepers, security personnel, realtors, mafia gangs and yes even pimps) . As a downside they also increased alcoholism, theft, gang fights and violence. Recently even some Russian neo-Nazi skinheads were uncovered.

For all the good and the bad, overall Israel seems to be thriving in these inhospitable lands and is re-shaping its identity after each immigration tidal wave.
trafael.tripod.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 9:51:50 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793897
 
Inside Rummy's brain. You may disagree, but at least you know for sure what he was thinking. I wonder who leaked? Probably an aide to one of the addressees.
_______________________________________________


Rumsfeld's war-on-terror memo
USA TODAY

Below is the full text of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's memo on the war on terror:

October 16, 2003

TO: Gen. Dick Myers
Paul Wolfowitz
Gen. Pete Pace
Doug Feith

FROM: Donald Rumsfeld

SUBJECT: Global War on Terrorism

The questions I posed to combatant commanders this week were: Are we winning or losing the Global War on Terror? Is DoD changing fast enough to deal with the new 21st century security environment? Can a big institution change fast enough? Is the USG changing fast enough?

DoD has been organized, trained and equipped to fight big armies, navies and air forces. It is not possible to change DoD fast enough to successfully fight the global war on terror; an alternative might be to try to fashion a new institution, either within DoD or elsewhere — one that seamlessly focuses the capabilities of several departments and agencies on this key problem.

With respect to global terrorism, the record since Septermber 11th seems to be:

We are having mixed results with Al Qaida, although we have put considerable pressure on them — nonetheless, a great many remain at large.

USG has made reasonable progress in capturing or killing the top 55 Iraqis.

USG has made somewhat slower progress tracking down the Taliban — Omar, Hekmatyar, etc.

With respect to the Ansar Al-Islam, we are just getting started.

Have we fashioned the right mix of rewards, amnesty, protection and confidence in the US?

Does DoD need to think through new ways to organize, train, equip and focus to deal with the global war on terror?

Are the changes we have and are making too modest and incremental? My impression is that we have not yet made truly bold moves, although we have have made many sensible, logical moves in the right direction, but are they enough?

Today, we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. Are we capturing, killing or deterring and dissuading more terrorists every day than the madrassas and the radical clerics are recruiting, training and deploying against us?

Does the US need to fashion a broad, integrated plan to stop the next generation of terrorists? The US is putting relatively little effort into a long-range plan, but we are putting a great deal of effort into trying to stop terrorists. The cost-benefit ratio is against us! Our cost is billions against the terrorists' costs of millions.

Do we need a new organization?

How do we stop those who are financing the radical madrassa schools?

Is our current situation such that "the harder we work, the behinder we get"?

It is pretty clear that the coalition can win in Afghanistan and Iraq in one way or another, but it will be a long, hard slog.

Does CIA need a new finding?

Should we create a private foundation to entice radical madradssas to a more moderate course?

What else should we be considering?

Please be prepared to discuss this at our meeting on Saturday or Monday.

Thanks.

Find this article at:
usatoday.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 10:20:23 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793897
 
Glenn Reynolds at "InstaPundit" thinks the Rummy leak should not have happened. I agree.
__________________________________

THE RUMSFELD MEMO SHOULDN'T HAVE LEAKED. That's not because it's bad -- I agree with Bryan Preston on the substance:

The press seems to be spinning it, and the Dems are of course spinning it too, as a direct refutation of all the Bush administration's positive public statements on the progress of the war. It is no such thing. It's a strategic document, written to force its small circle of recipients to think about a finite set of circumstances within the larger context of the war, and to justify their positions on the US progress or lack thereof with respect to those circumstances. It is the kind of memo a leader writes to his subordinates when he wants them to maintain focus and think about broad ways to win the war in the long term.

Frankly, I think this memo shows that Rumsfeld understands the war perhaps better than anyone else in Washington. Mindful of the successes in Afghanistan and Iraq and elsewhere, he also has his eye on the big picture and the difficulties ahead. He wants DoD to become more agile in dealing with a very agile threat. He wants no one under his command to rest on their laurels. Never one to be confused with Sister Mary Sunshine, Rumsfeld wants his troops to think long and hard and come up with solutions to the broad institutional problems that make fighting a small band of terrorists perhaps the most difficult task DoD has faced to date.

I disagree with Preston, though, about the real damage done by the leak. The real damage isn't that it gives our enemies a window into our military thinking, though that's certainly damaging. The real damage is that when this sort of self-examination -- which is essential to winning any war -- becomes the subject of leaks and bad press, you tend to get less of it.

As with the Plame affair, the reporter should be subpoenaed, and the leaker should be canned, or jailed. This sort of thing shouldn't be leaking.
instapundit.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 1:42:13 PM
From: Rollcast...  Respond to of 793897
 
... incessantly negative and increasingly shrill and virulent columns about the war in Iraq, for example, come across as positively gleeful.

like many of the posts at FADG...

;)



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (13379)10/22/2003 3:17:45 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 793897
 
Hatred may be the only rational emotion when confronting the truth about the monsters who run N. Korea:

Ethnic Infanticide and Forced Abortion

Perhaps the report’s most shocking finding is that repatriated pregnant women imprisoned in the jip-kyul-so are subjected to forced abortion. In the cases of advanced pregnancy, babies were killed immediately after birth. The goal of the regime is to eliminate children that may have been fathered by Han Chinese men.

Torture is Routine and Severe

Prisoners in all facilities are routinely beaten and kicked, made to sit motionless for long periods and denied food. For extra punishment, inmates are placed in small cells where it is impossible to lie down or stand up. Former prisoners interviewed for this report were subjected to water torture, deprived of sleep, and compelled to perform stand-up and sit-down repetitive motions. The penalty for attempting to escape is generally death by hanging or firing squad.

Rare Eye-Witness Accounts

North Korea is the most closed society in the world. Its prison system cannot be easily monitored. The small number of former prisoners who have managed to leave the country are often afraid to speak publicly for fear of endangering relatives still under the regime’s control. Remarkably, David Hawk interviewed more than 30 former prisoners and guards for The Hidden Gulag: Exposing North Korea’s Prison Camps, the majority of whom agreed to let their names be used.

One Former Prisoner’s Story -- Kim Yong

Speaking at the National Press Club in Washington on Wednesday, Kim Yong, detailed his experiences as a prisoner in two kwan-li-so prison colonies and his escape from prison and his subsequent escape from North Korea.

Kim was a lieutenant colonel at the time of his arrest and imprisonment. He had access to foreign currency and goods, a car and a chauffeur. Kim had been raised in an orphanage prior to rising in the ranks of the military. In the mid-90’s it was learned that Kim had been placed in the orphanage by his mother in 1957, when he was 7 years-old. That same year, Kim’s father had been executed as an American collaborator. His mother had changed his name and sent him to the orphanage for his own protection. In prison, Kim was accused of political crimes. His torture included being forced to kneel for long periods with a steel bar placed between his knees and calves, being suspended by his handcuffed wrists and being submerged in waist-deep cold water for extended periods.

Kim was required to work as a slave laborer in a coal mine and in a shop that repaired coal trolleys. While imprisoned at kwan-li-so No. 18, he surprisingly met his mother, with whom he was later allowed to live. In 1998, at his mother’s insistence, he escaped by first hiding in a coal car and later crossing the Tumen River into China. One year later, he made his way to South Korea by way of Mongolia. Said Kim, “If I had committed a crime, I would have taken responsibility for my actions. The only thing I did wrong was to grow up in a society with no respect for individuals or their human rights.”

hrnk.org